R
RedHeffer
New member
... anyone know about this microphone? Is it a step up from the v67?
A
atomictoyz
New member
You know, Ive been asking this vary question... Things Ive seen written around the various mic postings is that the V63M is the same as the MXL2003. I looked at Mars Music and its "Special Mars Exclusive thingie" The V63M has a 1" dia, 6 micron diaphragm, tranformerless output. The 2003 has a 1.06" 3 microndiaphragm and low cut switch. Both have FET preamps, single diaphragm, cardioid and a black finish.
I ordered a v63m and should get it on wednesday, after a brief overview and inspection of the mic and its propaganda material I will attempt to enlighten the curious. Until then...
Peace,
Dennis
I ordered a v63m and should get it on wednesday, after a brief overview and inspection of the mic and its propaganda material I will attempt to enlighten the curious. Until then...
Peace,
Dennis
crawdad
Dammit, Jim, Shut Up!
Atomictoyz--From what I have read the V-93 is the same as the 2003. As for the V-93 being a "step up" from the V67, I think a better analogy would be that it is a different direction. Both are very fine mics, but they sound different. I have a V-93, but I also want a V67 because I love the way it sounds on my voice.
I'm still not sure where the V-63 falls in regard to the other MXL mics. Would love to hear your impressions when you get one!
I'm still not sure where the V-63 falls in regard to the other MXL mics. Would love to hear your impressions when you get one!
C
chessrock
Banned
I get the impression the 67 is a good mic on the voice, while the 93 is a little more transparent, and therefore more versatile -- probably nicer on things like drum overhead and accoustic guitar.
