limiting/compressing the L+R of a JAZZ mix

  • Thread starter Thread starter earworm
  • Start date Start date
E

earworm

New member
today i recorded the first jazz band in my life,
actually it was the first jazz band i ever heard or saw play

i hoped to use my allen&heath GS3 on this project but i don't have my PSU yet so i did it all with my tiny soundcraft M8

i hardly used any eq, nothing on kick, a -3db cut on around 300hz on the snare, same on tom1+floor, lowcut on overheads,
compression? just a simple limiter on kick and snare to avoid dirty peaks

it was so much fun to record these guys, i didn't have enough inputs on the mixer, didnt have enough inputs on my computer, didnt have enough time, but it was LOVELY to record today !!!
i totally needed to be creative and find solutions for tons of little problems and everything worked out, this was the smootest recording i ever had !

i bet it was cause the musicians were so good, that does everything !

but now i got a mix that is not loud cause i didn't push the volume anywhere,
so i wonder, how do THEY mix jazz music?
(ps, members of this band are only like 22 years old so i dont think they mind some limiting...)


i'm used to record metal,punk,hardrock, i love to put a compressor and limiter on the drumbus, lots of compression and eq everywhere,

but in this case here maybe its best to just mix everything pretty natural and just put a WAVES L3 on the main insert?

i still mix with cubase....in a few months i'd like to totally mix with hardware;
so now i'm using plugins

got one song online, its a 192kps mp3, its the "clean recording",
only hardware, no plugins anywhere, it all entered my motu828 and i just used the pc as storage (and waves L3 for dithering to 16 bit but with the treshold at 0db). this is the song they are NOT gonna put on the demo, they didnt like it, so this is take one, but gives you a general idea of what kinda sound i got....(ps, the other songs have sax in it....rrrrrr)


i don't know anything about jazz...but i respect it, i think i got a clean recording, for a bedroom, but now i need the cream on the cake,

what are your suggestions?
leave it silent or make it loud?

 
I'd let it breath. Jazz should breath, and as long as your room sounds good, let the room sound breath too. I think you'd kill it playing with dynamics too much. I think a touch of compression on the stereo mix down would be nice, but mix down to tape if you have the option.
 
I'm traveling so I can't listen. But instead of using a limiter, I would just for the peaks, like when they all hit on the cadence. There won't be too many of those, usually just a few per song. Edit those down a little. That keeps the dynamics and keeps the song from being too quiet just because of a loud note here and there.

Then I'm not averse to using something like an LA2A on the mix, set to barely compress at all, maybe 0.5dB. I just like the sound of that plug when it's on.
 
i listened and i like the band they're pretty talented. Don't like the snare sound but that's not your fault. i would mix that snare down a bit, and mshilarious is right, get in there and smooth out those peaks but whatever you do don't over compress, cause it'll start to sound unnatural and thin
 
Sounds like a nice recording. I would not screw with it too much, go for a more natural. This really is "fusion" music, so I would suggest listening to some classic fusion stuff from the 70's to get some perspective. Chic Corea, Weather Report, Miles Davis.

The drums seem well recorded. I love jazz keyboards, totally sets a cool mood and vibe. The bass is a little lost, definitely needs some meat.

It is really cool that you are getting exposed to something totally different. Maybe try adding some elements from the music you like to help spice things up here or there. Not sure what that is, but mild experimentation might be in order.

Like, you could try flanging the drum solo, or making the bass solo a little dirtier. Automating the jazz keyboards to pan around once in a while, will give it a spacey feel. :cool:
 
Isn't that repeating keyboard line the theme to "The Exorcist" or am I imagining?

Would have been nice to get a room mic a little ways out from the drums. Perhaps you could simulate something by sending your drums through an aux send containing some heavy compression and some nice room reverb and mix to taste with your dry drums. Or try compression directly after the reverb...who knows. But yeah, take it easy with the metal mixing techniques.
 
I'm d/ling you sample now, which will take a while because whhere i'm at right now has only dial-up access. But in the meantime I'll concur that brendan and ms have it basically correct; keep the dynamics, taming only those transients that go off the charts for no good reason. Some soft, warm compression for "warmth" as ms said can be beneficial, but just to take advantage of the artifact sound of the gear or plug, not to actually clamp much compression.

I'd add also that you could probably have saved yourself some inputs and tracks by reducing the number mics on the drum kit. Unlike the genres of music you're used to working in, good jazz drum sounds are often gotten from just the two overheads or some simple stereo variation. My personal favorite for jazz and blues is an X/Y or ORTF pair in front of the kit with optionally a kick mic dropped down in front as well. An exception in jazz may be if the drummer uses mostly his brushes on the snare and/or hihat, in which case it may help to drop a mic in there for amplification. That's all not to say that you can't use a nest of mics on jazz, just that sometimes the best sound for jazz is a simple one.

I'll come back with more probably once the d/l is done (about halfway there at this writing). It's a real pleasure to have a detailed thread that's not related to metal, industrial or hip-hop for a change (not that there's anything wrong with those :) )

It would be great if there were more in your position who get such experience in genre-switching. I'm sure you are - or will be - amazed at the different techniques that work for the different genres, and that getting that certain snare sound, wall of guitar, twelve layers of machine-forged vocals or +1dBRMS levels are not always what great sound are all about. ;).

G.
 
OK got the d/l and listened to it. Reggie is right, that is the main line for "Tubular Bells" by Mike Oldfield; better known later as used as the theme for "The Exorcist." :) But the rest is pretty unrealted to the original, which is a common thing in jazz/fusion.

The tracking sounds pretty good and the mix is clean and up-front. I agree that the snare sound is not my favorite, it's got a bit too much ring and not enough pop in it for my personal tastes, but that is more a function of the tuning of the snare itself, not the recording.

I'd also - and again, this is personal preference and not scripture - dial back the snare. Unlike rock, the snare is not a centerpiece instrument in this kind of arrangement, unless you're recording a Buddy Rich or Art Blakey where the drummer is the showcase musician. With that dialed back, bring in the base just a small taste more (maybe via a small EQ bump around 200Hz or so) and the harmonizing keyboard a bit more to even the playing field and give the composition more textures to work with.

Once those levels were worked out I'd turn the stage inside out and make it more "natural". Again the difference between genres. I'd pull the drums in towards the center a bit more, unifying them as a cohesive instrument and then creatively use the mid-pan sections L & R for the keys and bass. Then the edges of the pan can be open for some room verb if you want to add some ambience that way.

That's just one of many ways to skin the cat, YMMV and all that. But you're off to a good start with some solid tracking and a good feel for mix. Very nice. :)

Why do I suddenly have a taste for green split pea soup?....

G.
 
bandname : skordatura (a term from classical music i think)
3 members + guest saxophone player
age : around 22
they all study at a conservatorium (like a Pro music school, so they can read notes, amazing !!!)


well i'm very exited about the entire demo cd,
normally i would have gone out tonight with my friends, but, hehe,
i stayed home, laid down on my bed and listened to the music, and fell asleep, never had that with the death metal i recorded lately ! :D

and thanks for the great info,
now maybe you guys are interested in my entire setup,
here it is:

my room is like 4 meters on 4 meters with a celing of probably 3 meters high,
i got an extreme simple drumbooth that i put around the drums in a U-form, the front is open so the kick & the entire kit can breath in the rest of the room, the drummer is always in a corner since i dont have enough space,
and i got a tiny basstrap in the opposite corder, the kick points right at it.

the keyboardplayer was in the same room, bassist too but his amp was in the bedroom nextdoors (we had to take the amp out of the room during the last song since my brother came back from a Lan party and he was totally drunk and stoned !!!!)

Mixer = soundcraft M8


the drumkit was a yamaha,
the snare was from a pearl drumkit,
cymbals were mostly sabian.
it wasnt a real jazz kick since it was like a 22" i think.
the drummer used sticks, no brushes (thank god cause i didnt have any extra condensers)

on the kick i first tried an AKG D12, an original one,
but we totally didnt like the sound of it, not in the kick not out the kick,
i replaced it with a sennheiser e602 and yes, thats it,
a more modern sound, i'm used to this and like the attack, its cleaner than my D12 for sure. i didn't use any eq on the kick, and i put a symetrix 501 (black version with iron toggle switch :cool: ) on the insert,
treshold at around -6db , the first song was recorded with a real fast attack but in the other three songs i used a slower attack to keep more of the bottom end. i used pretty fast release times, the limiter was set at around -3db, during the harder parts i noticed that there was like 6db or maybe 9db of compression, but during soft parts it didnt touch the treshold much.
i also put a little piece of heavy sound isolation material on the kick, to isolate the mic a bit more from the rest of the kit since i didn't know that i'd use gates during the mixdown or not... worked out ok i think.

on the snare i got my beyer 201, at first it was pointed on the skin, like most people do but then i had a dirty lowmid sound, i just had to point it down,
the first two songs i recorded i (think) i had the mic looking at the "chassis" of the snare, the side, and on the last two songs i aimed it at the ring,
and yes, still a little too much ringing, but i noticed that the snare has more definition and cuts a bit better trough the mix,
like i said the eq is just a little cut at around 300hz,
compressor on the insert is a symetrix 501 (gray model with plastic switch),
i hardly used compression on the snare, the wavefile in cubase goes up and down, it sure has dynamics, i'm not used to see that !!

tom1 had a muddy ugly ringing sound in the room, couldn't change much about it with changing mic positions, i tried to convice the drummer to retune it a little but he didnt want to, ok then...
i used a little cut at around 300hz and it helped, i also put a lowcut on it (100hz on the soundcraft),
the mic is a gray sennheiser md421, vintage full of dents,
as a compressor i first used a DOD r825, think its from the 80s (with a dbx160x chip in it, but its not really comparable, does have a similar sound but....u know)
its a compressor without treshold, and i find it not totally hissfree, the ratio jumps from 0 to 15 to 35 real quick so its more like a limiter i think,
but it was a bit too noisy so i replaced it with my good old dbx163x and it was better. (see, no controls can sound better than six buttons in a row!!)

for the floor, i also used a sennheiser md421, a black one, full of dents and years old, i did use the DODr825 on it (but a different one),
i hardly let it compress the signal, and didn't use a lowcut.

both of these toms were send to AUX 3, since i had to combine both toms on one track cause i didnt have enough inputs on my soundcard, and sadly i dont have busses on the M8. it worked great, i tried this with my previous mixer, an old studiomaster but it sounded like crap, someone told me that its typical that old mixers have noisy auxes, long live the M8, its so clean!

then overheads are Oktava mk012 , matched pair,
last year i recorded like 7 demo cds and i always used XY,
but i learned that my room doesn't sound good and then its better to kinda close mic your cymbals, its true ! this time i have so much more definition on my cymbals, i used some sort of AB technique, one mic over "snare-hihat-crash" and one over "ride-splash-floor" ,
it was kinda difficult to get a real good stereo image, i didnt try to make it too wide, i find that the mics were pretty close to the center of the drums.
i used a lowcut and a 3db cut on the lows (60hz) , and a little cut around 300hz, no insert on these two channels.

hihat is an AKG 414, cardioid, 150hz lowcut, little cut around 400, and apparantly i turned the bass (60hz) all the way to the left, dont know why, already had alowcut...


the bassplayer played on a yamaha bass, a peavy amp, but i forgot the model, i put a sennheiser md411 in front of the huge woofer, on the edge during the first two songs, and during the last two more to the center.
i didn't have any preamps left on my M8 so i used my symetrix 528 channel strip with an OK result but not impressive, i connected the output of this 528 to my patchbay and split the signal to my soundcard and to a "stereo" channel of my mixer, for the headphone mix of course.
first i put the amp in the hall, in front of the (closed) door of my bedroom
but there was too much bleed, so i checked if my brother was home and NO, so i put the amp in his room, BETTER ! and he doesn't have a bad sound in there, maybe i should let him have an accident so i can have his room too... mhhh yeah :D
oh, and in the last two songs there's no sax so i had a channel free,
i used a DI for the bass, trough a dbx160x, but that sound isnt that flattering,
i'm going to mix it a bit with the microphone signal to see if it can add some extra attack..

now, the biggest fun for me was the sax, i never recorded that,
never heard or saw one ever !! hahaha,
they all wanted to play together so i had to put that guy somewhere far away from the drums, i read a book about Joe Meek and he also recorded in his appartment and i know he recorded sax in his bathroom, i loved to read those anecdotes, and i heard several cds with his recordings, some sound just sick and there was some sax in bathroom with lots of spring verb on it, crazy, i don't have a spring verb but i'll see what my plugins can do.
we first tested the room of my brother to see if the sound was ok,
then the toilet , then the shower, then the bathroom,
the shower was loud, and the bathroom had a bigger "garage" sound.
now, i didnt really know what mic to use, and i didn't have any condensers left so i used the SM57 of course, a mic that i never use, only for live or when i run out of my gems :o
first i used it as a roommic, but that was too noisy, i needed too much input gain, in the end it aimed it at...the center or middle of the instrument,
not at the "bell" or at the mouthpiece,
i knew that u'd hear breathing noises and clicking of the "keys" , but i thought... mhhhh, i know sax from drum'n'bass and porno movies, it all sounds so fake there, maybe some real human noises make it.... ANALOG :)
. i didnt use a lowcut, just a little cut at around 400-500 hz (u cant see the frequency on the M8, i think that sucks, i know i gotto use my ears but i still like to know exactly what im touching....of course its a tiny little mixer...)
. i put a dbx163x on the insert, didnt use much of compression

then there was a keyboard and no more analog inputs !
thats why i love my tc electronic triple c multiband compressor,
hehe, big name for just a simple compressor i think but sounds clean & ok.
it has a spdif digital out that goes to the digi in of my motu828.
he played on a big keyboard with midi out, connected to a sound module,
but i forgot the name, it did sound nice though, i heard alot of total crap keyboards and this one had the nicest sounds, i'm gonna email them and ask what it was again.
i used some compression on the mids, cause i found that it did have some dirty sounds there...
had the treshold at around -9 db,
treshold of the highs -2 (but never touched the treshold)
treshold of the lows at -3 (and hardly ever touched the treshold).
nice thing about the Triple C is that u can use the analog and digital outputs at the same time, so the analog ones went to another free stereo channel of the mixer, for the headphone mix.
(i'd like to add that the M8 has a spdif out too which is wonderful, u can choose mainLR or aux3+4, this is exactly what u need : 8 direct outs and 2 digital outs, same configuration as most multitrack soundcards)

extra details:
i had to use an extra aux send only for the sax player,
when he blows his instrument he gets lots of pressure on his ears and i think he gets deaf that way or something.., just blow on your thumb and u'll know what i mean. so he needed to hear himself and the keys loud, but the rest didnt want to hear him that hard..
no problem,
aux send to inject-A of my headphone amp (OZ audio hm6 , the best HPamp i ever used), and everyone was happy.


voila,

a tiny mixer with 8 preamps, direct outs and aux sends,
+ an extra channel strip does the job !


the bad was supposed to arrive at 9.00 but there was lots of snow on the road and they came from far so they had a little delay, i just called them to let them know that there was no stress necessary, they dont pay per hour so we can hang out a little longer afterwards if we want....thats HOME RECORDING !!
we started setting everything up, i still had to connect quite some stuff since i did a live PA this weekend and didnt totally reconfigure my studio setup.

at around 12.00 o'clock we had acceptable sounds on all instruments, decent levels and we were recording, took a break at 14.00 to eat,
recorded till 18.30 i think

we were ALL very tired after this session, we were amazed how much energy gets sucked out of your body during a few hours of concentration,
so from now i just dont want to record more than 3 songs per day,
i used to do 5 , sometimes 6 , and worst case was 23 songs on two evenings !
but now i'm so totally happy with my results, its not pro but EXITING !
my first recording of 2006 is a success, it went smooth, it was fun, and i wont have much work on the mixdown :D


i've been recording since i was a kid, but with the worst equipment u can imagine of course, just for fun, me and my brother were always making music, so i've got YEARS of music on cassettes, minidiscs, cds, dvds, harddiscs, but it all sounds....like hihihi....
3 years ago i deceided that i was getting good enough to start recording OTHER people, cause for 19 years i only recorded myself.
last year i started recording bands for real, for money,
and the past 12 months were a STRUGGLE with sick malfunctioning hardware, selfmade cables, the cheapest of the cheapest everywhere cause U KNOW, u need a shedload of equipment to record and u can't get the good stuff just at once.
so my plan was: i spend every cent i have on equipment, i dont ever go on vacation, dont go out and stuff, i buy cheap gear, use it, record a band, sell the equipment (most of the time with profit....thats business),
then i dont have a band for a few months so i sell everything, i just sold EVERYTHING i had, all my music gear, exept my drumkit and groovebox!
when there is a new band i go buy some more equipment,
so every band i recorded was with totally different equipment,
different mixers, cables, compressors, mics, room treatment and placement, i just kept my soundcard and monitors (and built my self a decent audio pc)

i love this way of working, i've seen SO MUCH of the junk ass cheap low budget machines, and there is so much worthless stuff out there !
i learned that beat-to-death old scratchy hardware from the 70s or 80s is build LIKE A TANK, and it sounded good back then and still sounds good now,
i spent alot of time searching for my sound,
i dislike plugins and i love warm sounds, too bad i dont have a tape recorder,
but i'm saving for a Studer (hehe),
so if u check out my equipment u'll see that allmost everything in my rack and my mic case is vintage, i find that this equipment adds some extra power in the low end, not really warmth, but something,
and new compressors just seem to eat away bottom end, make it plastic, thin, unpleasant,

this was the first recording i ever had where there was NO equipment malfunctioning, amazing ! no broken cables, no compressors that suddenly dont give a signal, no noisegates that CLICK, no exessive hiss, no peaks,
no paniking when i ran out of inputs,
i left a good impression on the band and i think they'll come back

cause this were only three songs (plus a bonus for their website)

i got a few pictures, not much cause i dont like distracting the musicians with a camaera, its bad , certainly the flash !

ok,

this was the story of today,
i'll upload the other songs too,
and i'd like to continue talking about mixing the drums, thats what i'm gonna do first.... but i'll first let you guys read this book

...end of report...
 
Last edited:
earworm,

Excellent production note details! Thanks for sharing. A couple of quick comments on a few points...

You are a man after my own heart with much of your gear selection. I wish I had the connections and budget for a lot of that old iron you have :).

Re the kick drums: You are right, the kick does not sound like a typical jazz kit because of it's size, a little too "big" in timbre; but being that this is more of a California fusion than a classic jazz, you can get away with that much better. And I am also glad to hear that someone else actually likes and uses the e602; this is one of my main go-to mics for kick, and I've always felt so alone in that respect ;).

Re the sax: You seem to have a large inventory of 421s. Unfortunately you may have used them all up elsewhere. But in the future, a vintage 421 (or better, if you have one, a 441) are textbook go-to mics for sax. Key clacking is to taste; in classic jazz, the key clacking is almost desired. As one moves more to the fusion/smooth jazz area, the amount of clacking is usually diminished (your example of a porn soundtrack is hilariously spot-on :D). But IMHO it depends greatly on the style and sound of the player and music. There's lot's of great clasic jazz a la Coleman Hawkins and the like where the key clakcing is minimized to emphasize the smooth tone of the player's style. OTOH, there's good sounding modern fusion where the clacking goes well with a harsh or brash style of sound.

So go with the feel and tune the sax keys in and out as desired. A common basic micing technique is to use the 421 or 441 on a stand about 6"-12" in front of the sax, and mounted just a few inches above the height of the bell. Point the mic more down towards the bell to reduce key clacking and to get a fuller resonance. To get more of the clacking and flatten out the dynamics a bit, rotate the mic to point up more towards the keys. Rotate up and down like that until you have the sound you want.

Of course it helps in this kind of setup to have a sax player who can belt out his chops without swinging the instrument all over the place. If he has to move to get the required performance, then a clip-on mic on the rim of the bell may help augment the sound.

Thanks again for the detailed sharing. Very informative!

IMHOLSMFTYMMVETC.

G.
 
ps, i typed a mistake, the mic on the bassamp is a 441, not a 411 !!

i had another 421 but i sold it cause it had a basic humm ( :o )
and i'm definately gonna get me some more 441's cause i love this mic,
but i didnt know it was a favorite on sax, thanks for informing me !

now, friday i'm going to start working on the Clean up of the songs,

in general, do people use a Gate on the kick and snare?
i gate the toms manually since i trust myself more than my computer.

and i find that there is a big much kick in this mix,a bit too much attack perhaps, i like it this way but i think jazzy stuff is a bit more ...muffled,
i'll probably keep it 'loud' since i love to hear a kick in a mix,
and yes the snare will go down a bit, maybe i'll take away some more high and add some low , we'll see

and the bass will get a nice full bottom, dont worry,

i was even thinking of making a special darkambient backgorund track for one of their songs, they got this one very experimental song and the intro is a bit empty, Or i'll use reverbs and stuff in an automix or i'll put a silent but scary space-sound left and right, to distract the attention...


i just have to say it again, today, this was recording,
i felt a bit uncertain the days before the recording (NEVER on the day itsself, thats forbidden) but i know i'm good in improvising,
it felt like i really had to prove myself today since these musicians know what they're playing, they know quality,
and i always liked amateur metal bands cause my skills and gear was never good enough, i didnt mind recording 25 guitar takes PER SONG per guitarist on one day, i thought it was normal,

a while ago i found out that the band deceides the quality, NOT me,
i just avoid the problems, or fix them,
but i always thought i wasnt good enough so working with (the Lowest) amateurs gave me a relaxed feeling, they didnt know anything about sound, and i a little, so i win :)

but now i think i'm going to look more for older bands, experienced people, and real adult genres like jazz and blues, i like it, they dont play in 4/4 and i dont understand it, i can't tap my feet on it but the rythms make me wild!

and its SO much easier to get a good sound if THEY sound good,

hoh, this is thé best hobby on earth, wont be able to sleep tonight
 
the room after the band left:

belgian_underground_studio.gif


the drumkit when we started cleaning up:

drums_skordatura.jpg
 
Cool. Nice to see some Events like mine. Those look like TR8s ? Although the 20/20s are practicaly identical.
 
yes it are events tr8's ; i like them,
eventough its a little difficult to hear a real good stereo image,
sometimes its a bit hard to perfectly hear the balance between L+R,
i'm talking about tiny details in the mix, like "isnt the snare a little bit too much to the right in the overheads...."
but the position of my speakers isnt ideal and i NEED roomtreatment,
if these speakers break down i'll go for the same brand, maybe the 2020's since i heard they might be a bit better,

i use mackie monitors all the time in other studios, whats their type, (826 i think)
8", ugly looking with a metallic tweeter, not a bad sound but i prefer my TR8's

today i talked to an engineer who records jazz, we listened to my mix, he gave good suggestions and on monday we'll sit together and compare cds he recorded with my stuff, thats gonna be quite some experience!
 
Fixing your stereo image (suggestions)

I have to say I am definitely happy with my TR8s. Nice even and pretty true. Not a lot of coloration or missing detail IMO for the price. The mackies are the 824 I believe. Never heard them, but since they run $1,300 I did not waste time listening to things way outta my price range.

After looking at your room, you may have some problems with imaging, because it looks like your computer stuff is obstructing some of the image. It would be better to have your speaker monitors more infront, or computer things pushed more to the back. Uncluttering the space between your speakers, if possible, would definitely help your image.

Also, for fine tweaking of stereo/panning issues, try some good studio headphones. I use the AKG 240S, and they are a good start. I often go between the two for fine tuning details.

ALSO, have you tweaked the stereo balance of your TR8s ? You can't rely on the gain dial in back. What I mean is, having the gain dial at 12 o-clock "visually" on both monitors does not assure each side is putting out the same amount of juice.

Anyways, I was REALLY surprised when I fixed mine. You need to use an SPL meter. Let me know, and I can explain how to do it. When I fixed mine, the imaging popped right out, and the speakers started working together !

Sounds sweet about hooking up with that guy. Very cool you are going to get into some new music. :cool:
 
ah, yes, the volume on the back of the speakers, i find it stupid that its on the back, sometimes when i turn my speakers on/off i touch the volume and it changes, most of the time i just turn the volume all the way open,

how did you calibrate them? i'm definately interested,
i've got an old spl meter, with a VU, soon i'll get me a modern digital meter too.
i didnt know that the volume of both speakers isnt matched, a bit sad i think.

and if i ever win the lottery i'm going to replace my two computerscreens with lcd or flatscreen things, cause now indeed my screens might block a little bit of sound,

and the tweeters of my monitors, should they be at exactly the height of my ears? now they're like 10 inch below "my ear holes" when i sit behind my desc at mixer position
 
I thought it was a beautiful recording! :) Very clean! So much in music is subjective but I do believe the "artist" can make us shine or sour. You had a vey good group that let your talents out!
 
fact ! if the band sounds good, the cd sounds good
(or u gotto be a cra^ppy engineer)

now for general mixing techniques of jazz,

i got told NOT to put a gate on anything,
maybe i'll just Not use the channel with the toms,
and i notice that if i pan the hihat mic i get too much snare on the right side (if i pan it a little to the right)

and the kick should have less attack, bit more bottom, less volume,
and the snare is too loud

thats gonna be my first changes....and i'll put a general soft reverb on the drumkit
 
(Don't forget the bass phattening! It needs help)
 
Back
Top