Is the Stedman any better than the 24 dollar metal pop filters?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Slowjett
  • Start date Start date
...I have an original Stedman and I also have the Peluso screen (the 2nd link you list)...no difference...either will do the job...as I am sure the other one you reference will as well...save your money and get the lower cost version...you have to realize that Stedman was the first to offer the metal type, so there were no other options except the nylon, but in the past year or so many other metal-type variations have become available...
 
Metal Pop Screens

I saw one review awhile back that was very very positive about the Stedman.
http://www.stedmancorp.com/pages/xl.html
It might be wise to do a web search on the reviews
http://mixonline.com/mag/audio_stedman_proscreen_psps/index.html
http://www.stedmancorp.com/pages/par_review.html
http://www.stedmancorp.com/pages/fea_ps101_review.html

I personally own the sE Electronics version that looks exactly the same as the Stedman 101 but the sE is $39.95. :D
http://www.seelectronics.com/popscreen.html
http://www.zzounds.com/a--2676837/item--SEEPOP
It BG/HSG
 
Anyone have any experience with this one? I plan to place my weekly Musicians Friend order this afternoon :D and wonder if I should pick one of these up while I'm at it. Think this one would be as effective and transparent as the Stedman and the others listed above?
 
I have one of those...they work well for the purpose of pop filtering but, I found that the flexible arm on it was a little weak. It had a tendancy to not stay where I positioned it. A little aggrivating. I found the big fix by inserting a piece of coat hanger wire inside the flex arm. It works great now.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top