At Musicians friend there are reviews of Adobe. I like the fact everyone says it's the easiest to use. But one review has me worried. The guy says that Adobe is great unless you want to do midi tracks. What does he mean?
At Musicians friend there are reviews of Adobe. I like the fact everyone says it's the easiest to use. But one review has me worried. The guy says that Adobe is great unless you want to do midi tracks. What does he mean?
I'm not exactly sure what he meant but Adobe is not a midi sequencer like, say Sonar. It can playback midi files but you cant record or edit midi notes/events.
However, it does support ReWire. If you have Reason you can record tracks directly from Reason straight into Adobe without having to record, then import the recorded tracks into Audition.
This is the main reason I switched to Reaper. I was also kinda pissed at myself for throwing away $$ on Adobe when I could have spent $40 for a program just as capable as the extremely expensive software (Sonar, Cubase, etc). I'd give it a shot!
There's a lot of praise for Reaper around here and for good reason.
At Musicians friend there are reviews of Adobe. I like the fact everyone says it's the easiest to use. But one review has me worried. The guy says that Adobe is great unless you want to do midi tracks. What does he mean?
I am Audition user. I record and mix audio tracks mostly but sometimes I need one or two none guitar tracks.
Let’s say I need to do one Hammond track using midis.
I use Cubase just for recording and editing. When it’s done I export it as WAV and import it to my A. Audition Multitrack session.
But if you are going to work with midi mostly, then AA is not proper tool for you.