how to control rms levels

  • Thread starter Thread starter jbonil1
  • Start date Start date
J

jbonil1

New member
hi yall i'm getting hi rms levels (-5,-4db's?) for my songs and when I use a limiter to get the mix to -0.3db I get even higher levels, I read somewhere that the rms levels to aim for on pop songs (as mine) is -10db. what can I use to control rms levels other than a limiter. my song sounds decent but too hot. you can check out my song at reverbnation.com/tobyrock
 
You should be okay just pulling back the master fader, I thought. You need to pull that limiter off of your master though.
 
hi yall i'm getting hi rms levels (-5,-4db's?) for my songs and when I use a limiter to get the mix to -0.3db I get even higher levels, I read somewhere that the rms levels to aim for on pop songs (as mine) is -10db. what can I use to control rms levels other than a limiter. my song sounds decent but too hot. you can check out my song at reverbnation.com/tobyrock
I'd recommend reversing the process a couple of ways. First, a blanket statement like "the proper RMS for pop songsis" is bogus; The RMS to aim for is the one that your ears tell you sounds best, not some arbitrary number. You say yourself your mixes sound to hot. That's a great sign, a lot of people would never hear that. If you really feel you have to crush you mixes (do you really feel that, or are you just following what the unwashed masses are saying?), then crush them until they sound too crushed, and then pull back on the compression just until it sounds OK again.

Second, I would recommend against just throwing your mix against a brick wall at -0.x dBFS. You should work in stages, kind of like carving wood. You don't just cut right to the quick in one shot; you do the rough cut first, to get rid of the bulk and get the rough dimensions, then some chiseling to the basic shape, rough sanding, and finally fine sanding to wind up with the final product.

There are several variations and methods here, here's just one basic variation:

First knock down the dozen or so wild/untamed peaks in your mix manually, either with your volume automation envelope, or highlighting the peaks and knocking down the volume for that region, or redrawing those peaks with the pencil tool. Whichever one you'r emost efficient with using.

Next, try more standard soft knee compression at an easy 2:1 or so, with the threshold set a dB or two above the current RMS level. Follow that up with parametric EQ to get rid of any honkers brought out by the compression.

Then try hard limiting. If you have to push more than 2 or 3 dBs of life out of your mix in order to get the unrealistic volume you wish, then undo the limiting and repeat the previous light compression/paraEQ step a second time.

Try the limiting again. If you still have to squeeze nore than a couple of dB of blood out of your baby at that point to get where you want, it's probably going to sound like it's being pushed too far anyway, in which case be happy with the RMS you got and move on.

The choice is always yours as to where you want to set the balance in traeoff between volume and sound quality. If you feel you are sacrificing too much quality to get to Volume X, then screw Volume X and skip the final steps in that above process at any point you wish. There are NO magic numbers.

G.
 
hi yall i'm getting hi rms levels (-5,-4db's?) for my songs and when I use a limiter to get the mix to -0.3db I get even higher levels..
Because it sounds like it's already compressed and/or limited a lot- in the mix and/or tracking?
 
what I mean by too hot is that it sounds good but with way too much volume not overcompressed or overlimited. sory southside glenn forgot the first rule "if it sounds good youre doing it right" so for me it sounds good I'll leave it that way. thanks
 
it sounds good but with way too much volume
Then jndeitz has it right, just pull back on the overall gain.

But I gotta say that if you have to pull your peaks back to -5dBFS just to "control" your RMS levels by throttling them all the way *down* to -10dBFS - which is what we're actually talking about here - and the mix actually sounds good, that I think your studio may just be set up just a bit too close to Isla de Vieques :D.

G.
 
Hmmm, I listened to one of the tracks and it didn't seem all that loud. I wouldn't worry about what the meters say.
 
Last edited:
thanks everyone, southside glenn how do you know about isla de vieques?
 
thanks everyone, southside glenn how do you know about isla de vieques?
Just from what I have seen and read in newspapers and on the news and stuff like that. Believe it or not, there are a few mainland Americans left who do know what goes on outside their own borders ;).

G.
 
Back
Top