T
tojo
New member
I'm trying to think of ways I can avoid latency before I decide to spend money on a macbook for recording. I've done lots of recording before, but now that I think of it I can't really remember what I've done about latency. I've noticed that in software programs (gareband, cubase, live etc) when you turn on the monitor option you will hear a latency in the sound. Of course many know this, as well as being able to lower the latency by changing the buffer size on your computer (using something like ASIO4ALL). I think that what I have done is run a behringer analog mixer into my line in on a computer, and then it just comes out the headphones and there is no delay... because it's just line in and right out the headphones. I can't really remember though (i know thats dumb) but, I'm trying to think of a routing option for recording tracks for a song using my analog mixer to monitor, I suppose you would say. I'm having trouble thinking up the routing option though...
If I send the tracks that I have recorded to the mixer I can hear them, while recording a track at the same time. So example. I have guitar recorded on my program (i.e. garageband/logic whatever) and I send it to input 2 on my mixer from the computer headphone out. Then I have my nice condenser on channel one recording my vocals. So I should be able to hear it with no latency...right? But then the problem is mixer has to go back into the computer in the line in port... and therefore the guitar will get re-recorded onto the vocal track. There must be some button I can work with on my mixer so that like the guitar channel (#2) is routed to a bus or something (so I can still hear it) but so it doesn't go out the main outs. I don't have a great knowledge of my mixer... but should this provide someone the ability to monitor without latency? I guess you would consider it monitoring the signal dry, because you can't hear the efx that you might apply in the program (which I probably wouldn't anyways)
I'm just thinking I should get a firebox and use the software mixer to get zero latency and record that. I also heard that you can get pretty low latency with the firebox (like 4-6 ms?). Anyways, sorry about the huge post, and if it seems really trivial, as the answer may be extremely obvious... I just haven't picked up on it yet.
Thanks for reading.
If I send the tracks that I have recorded to the mixer I can hear them, while recording a track at the same time. So example. I have guitar recorded on my program (i.e. garageband/logic whatever) and I send it to input 2 on my mixer from the computer headphone out. Then I have my nice condenser on channel one recording my vocals. So I should be able to hear it with no latency...right? But then the problem is mixer has to go back into the computer in the line in port... and therefore the guitar will get re-recorded onto the vocal track. There must be some button I can work with on my mixer so that like the guitar channel (#2) is routed to a bus or something (so I can still hear it) but so it doesn't go out the main outs. I don't have a great knowledge of my mixer... but should this provide someone the ability to monitor without latency? I guess you would consider it monitoring the signal dry, because you can't hear the efx that you might apply in the program (which I probably wouldn't anyways)
I'm just thinking I should get a firebox and use the software mixer to get zero latency and record that. I also heard that you can get pretty low latency with the firebox (like 4-6 ms?). Anyways, sorry about the huge post, and if it seems really trivial, as the answer may be extremely obvious... I just haven't picked up on it yet.
Thanks for reading.