Hooks/Chorus: The Key To Your Songwriting Success

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mike Freze
  • Start date Start date
M

Mike Freze

New member
Hey, everyone. If you need to see more detailed advice on titles for songs, check my other thread on this topic. I have TONS of good stuff in there for you.

As an experienced songwriter who trained through a publisher with London Records (Los Angeles), I can tell you this: you need to get great choruses (hooks) for your songs or they will never get radio play, recording contracts, publishers to work with you, or artists to want to record your original songs.

The hook is a repetitive line (or 2-4 lines) that is the payoff for the song you wrote. It is the part of your song that people go away remembering, humming in their car, the part that they wait for when they hear your song (even waiting through your normal verses before that chorus comes along).

Am I kidding? No. Listen to dozens of top-40 hits on the radio (today or yesterday) and see why they are hits. Listen for the hook. It is obvious in 95% of the radio top hits. When you hear it come in a song, it grabs you and pulls the whole song together. It's the moment of release, the great climax from the build up of verses or bridges that you have going before it hits that spot.

A great chorus (or hook) usually includes the EXACT song title you have inside of it. It may be the title repeated several times and that's it ("I Can't Go For That," Hall & Oates), or it may be said in the first line of the chorus and then a second line is slightly different but close to the song title and then repeats itself ("Heard It Through The Grapevine," Creedence Clearwater Revival).

A chorus or hook needs to climax in the song: perhaps going to a higher key, adding a few extra instrument sounds in the background, maybe a few vocal harmonies that aren't there in the normal verses, slightly increased volume, etc. Then when you go back to the verse, you drop things down a bit and start building up to the next chorus.

A great song is an ebb and flow kind of thing: you start our small and simple, gradually build, and pay off with the chorus. Then you drop it down a bit and re-build to the next phase.

There are times when a chorus starts a song even before you do the verses. "Hooked On A Feeling" by B.J. Thomas "Sunshine On My Shoulders" (John Denver) does this too. It grabs your attention right off the bat.

If it's more of a story-type song that leads to a climax, then the chorus should come later (very common with country songs, folk songs, and even some pop tunes).

Remember, a great commercial, radio-friendly type song has to do its thing in a 3-4 minute time period. Radio stations won't allow longer songs (unless you're Led Zeppelin with "Stairway To Heaven" or The Eagles with "Hotel California"). They have so many songs they can play in their time slots, everyone is competing for a piece of the pie, they have to fill some time for their advertisers and sponsors, and longer songs from an unknown artist won't cut it.

Can a hook or chorus just be a musical riff or instrumental? No, you still need some words, melody, etc. That's what makes people sing along and buy your record. BUT, a lot of great hits do have instrumental hooks in the song. Usually though, they are at the beginning of the song, played through the verses, or played in the background of the chorus.

Instrumental hooks: "Day Tripper" (The Beatles), "China Grove" (The Doobie Brothers), "Long Cool Woman In A Black Dress" (The Hollies), etc. You get the idea. But those hooks don't replace the chorus hook in those songs: they are additional, instrumental hooks that work towards the chorus. If you can have a great instrumental hook and a great chorus (hook) in the same song, you've got a winner!

Mike Freze
 
... Listen to dozens of top-40 hits on the radio (today or yesterday) and see why they are hits...

I think the reason all the songs are hits have nothing to do with anything musical like hooks or choruses.

It's 100% about having tons of money from something else to pump into payoffs. That's entirely what it is.

It's been a long time (decades) since the quality of the song had any bearing on it's success.

Personally I think the so-called drug war and all the money that was made from it was probably the main reason for it booming like it did.
 
Forgot These Points

Here's a great idea that I try to use myself. When writing songs (or partial song ideas), start with creating great choruses (hooks) that can be payoffs for whatever songs you write.

Save (on tape or computer) dozens of different chorsuses that could be great for some potential song in the future. If you do this, try to incorporate your exact song title within each chorus: that's what people expect when they hear radio-type hit songs.

Then if you have a great chorus with the song title inside of it, half the battle is won. Then you can write your verses, instrumental hooks, bridges, etc. AROUND that chorus you already created. For one, it will give the rest of your song focus and direction so you stay glued to the theme of your song. It also will suggest what rhythm patters, chord structures, verse melodies and verse lyrics that you need to blend with your pre-created chorus.

Otherwise, if you start blindly with a few lines to start out a new song (from a moment's inspiration, let's say), you don't know where the second verse should go if you don't have a definite hook (chorus) to complete the point of your verses after you write them. Verse one might seem great, verse two is good also, but when you go to that payoff (chorus), do they lead to that chorus naturally? If not, you will find yourself "forcing" a chorus to go with your verses so it all fits together and sometimes that can sound phony or unnatural. I think it's better to "force" your verses to fit with the payoff: after all, that's the bread and meat of the song. No good hook (chorus), no satisfaction for the listener.

Does this limit your inspiration as a songwriter who just wants to sit down at a guitare or piano and improvise, brain-storm, do what hits him at the moment as something to work with? No, not at all. Just re-direct all that to creating choruses (with titles in them) to begin with. Then go for your spontaneous thoughts FOR THE CHORUS. If you can do it to begin a song with a few lines or verses (we all do that), then why not think to start our with the payoff of the song?

It might be hard to get inspired to "force" verses later on to fit your chorus, but so what? Without a good chorus, you're doomed. If you do like to start with a few lines of a first verse as an inspiration for a song, be SURE to get a chorus (WITH the exact song title) in there somewhere before you go too far along with additional verse lines, second verses, etc. Why? Because you won't get your 3-4 song to focus towards the middle climax (hook). And remember, you are not writing a book: you have to tell a well-structured story as a songwriter in just a few minutes time. No verses that ramble on, make each verse count, connect to each other, and stay with a single, central theme for your song that gets expressed in the chorus. Too many ideas or themes? Break them up into different songs. You don't have time to add too much in a 3-4 minute song. Take an idea, say it one way in a verse, slightly different in the next verse, but keep it all to one thought so the chorus always reflects everything you previously said. Remember, the chorus is usually the same repeated thing every time to come around to it. Listen to the radio and you'll see it's true. So if you waiver too far from verse to verse in ideas, the repeated chorus won't "fit" each time it comes around.

Mike Freze
 
dintymoore

Hey man, I see your point. There's no doubt that big bucks and the right contacts can make a song happen (payoffs, bribes, etc.). It happens all the time.

I'm just trying to get aspiring songweriters (that's all of us) to realize that although that might be true (as well as being in the right place at the right time, pure luck). It might happen for a song or two for one artist that suddenly makes it big, but in the long run, if the PUBLIC doesn't continue to buy that artist's material (even if it's continued to be promoted through big bucks or special contacts), then that's the end of the line for him or her.

Ther's a lot of "one hit" artists out there (Like Sam The Sham with "Wooly Bully") that might have got that one hit from what you said earlier. But did they ever last? No.

My point is, the great artists and songwriters who learn their craft very well and are consisently writing great songs will continue to get support from the public (people who BUY their music) and that's why they remain successfull year after year regardless of big money in the picture. The average radio lister or CD buyer could care less about the nasty moeny behind the scenes. If they don't like what they hear, they will stop buying. End of story.

Record companies, publishers, producers, artists, etc. won't take less than great songs from anyone even if money was used to get that song recorded. It MIGHT happen if a song is great, but nobody will go for lousy songs even if the money was there. Why? Public, public, public. It's the millions of record buyers and radio listeners that keep all these people in business.

I think you're right that this happens (unfortunately). But I still believe that great talent (and CONSISTENT talent that keeps producing great things because they learned their craft) will always find a way.

I once said before in a forum comment that 95% of all songwriters don't know their craft as professionals. It's true! That's why most publishing companies, record companies, and producers throw away almost everything sent into them unsolicited because they find very few GREAT songs out there inspite of the fact that they are sent thousands of songs to listen to. Those who know their craft consistently are recognized right away by those in the buisness because it's so rare to find those who do in demo submissions sent to them. The cream will rise to the top, one way or another, even if it takes some time. Great talent does not go unnoticed over time: ESPECIALLY if it's consistent.

Peace! Mike Freze
 
Hmmm...

Not that I dont value your post; I believe it. Its logical, and you can HEAR what you say in the songs...

my question: how are we to know you didnt just rephrase this info from some "how to write songs" website and post it here? I'm not accusing, I'm just curious. What hits have you penned?
 
Hmmm...

Not that I dont value your post; I believe it. Its logical, and you can HEAR what you say in the songs...

my question: how are we to know you didnt just rephrase this info from some "how to write songs" website and post it here? I'm not accusing, I'm just curious. What hits have you penned?

PS - went and did a google... this is you?

http://www.linkedin.com/pub/mike-freze/11/675/477

okay, I'm impressed then if it is. Keep dropping tidbits, lol.
 
No that's not him - he's much older than that website guy...
 
I like what has been said here.

I think your right in the fact that there definately needs to be a good hook (Chorus)

However i have come up with a good msuical tune that is quite catchy but doesn't have much of a chours. I'd refer to a small band in Australia known as Big Scary who do something quite simmilar to what i'm describing.

Songs don't nessesarily need to have chorus do they?
 
Songs don't nessesarily need to have chorus do they?

I'm not just agreeing with you because you're a fellow Aussie, but I rarely write songs with an obvious chorus - I generally latch onto a verse and change it in some way each time... and then do an interesting instrumental passage as a middle 8.

Depends upon what you're trying to achieve. I'm just trying to write songs that I think are good and couldn't really give a rat's arse if they're never famous, which, seeing they don't have sing-a-long choruses, I'm sure they won't be.

Do what you want to do.

If that's a more commercial approach, fine, nothing wrong with that, but don't do things just because someone says you should.

Push the boundaries a little...
 
Hmmm...

The guys RIGHT though. If we just try to write songs for ourself or our girlfriend, well... then we are like a tree that falls in the forest that no one ever hears. I myself can easily see falling into several of his "pitfalls". I tried to tell too much of a story, too many verses. No clear good lyrical hook... then I have tried to "force" additional verses onto a cool title or one perfect verse I liked.

I completely understand the guy that said to try experimental stuff, and not to do things just because someone said to... but...

a LOT of "rules of thumb" exist because they are "boiled down" wisdom, distilled from centuries of slowly evolving classical music. "standard" chord progressions exploit harmonic relationships between the key(s). The "standard" bridge key comes from the textbook "second subject and its usual key" in classical music, the vaunted "sonata form"

I basically got into classical music composition, because I had read numerous times that bands like Pink Floyd had classical creds. Early genesis... "the list goes on", all had classical creds, OR... access to someone like a producer with that skill (beatles? LMAO)

Heck, even country... with its "3 chords and the truth" philosophy... I hear the occasional "big intro" with beautiful piano and a 30-second ORCHESTRA, before it falls away and becomes the "country song"...

They are not "rules" per-se... and you do break them and get something refreshingly new, but... these rules of thumb are distilled wisdom that took the MASTERS hundreds of years to figure out.

These "rules" or "guidelines" people with professional experience hand out, I find them to be wonderful. You have to break ONE or TWO rules per song to be "fresh", but... if you ignore ALL the rules? You end up with "noise", I suppose. people who CONSISTENTLY produce well-received material have definite tools of the tradecraft.

I herre and there come back to my original intent, to try once again to write "popular music". Something that couold maybe become the music for a song people would like to buy. *shrugs* the better my classical sonata stuff gets... its working its way into my "popular" attempts. slowly, but it is.

music with a "something classical you can HEAR, but not put your finger on it" comes and goes in and out of style. learning "rules" or "guidelines" is not time wasted, in my book. Yet, to each his own.

Do as you will. "good" music can be heard, in any genre. When something is "good", peopel that hate that style of music will begrudgingly admit "I hate *whatever*, but... I have to admit this is pretty decent..."

I try to take it all under advisement.
 
I completely understand the guy that said to try experimental stuff, and not to do things just because someone said to... but....

Hey, I'm not doing Metal Machine Music here, I write pop songs, and they're hooky enough... I'm just saying that just following a "standard operating protocol" when songwriting can be a little unfulfilling - and while it's useful to understand the structures that work, don't be afraid to try something new and try to define yourself that way.

There's a tremendous number of very average songwriters out there who just ape the standard formats and produce crap. Don't be one.

A song doesn't necessarily have to have a chorus... ask Joni Mitchell. Don't take my word for it.
 
I think at the end of the day it all boils down to what you perceive as "good" music.

I know that my tastes in music certainly aren't for everyone and may only then be popular by a minor group of people. So what you play and how you play it i don't think makes much difference in the grand scheme of things.

I understand that there are ways to write and song, and this is just one of them, but again it comes down to a personal level. How you want to write a song is up to you i think, surely i'm not bagging this guide its a good way to learn. But i dont think it has to be law.
 
Hmmm....

Well, for me...

I always fail when I try to write lyrics and make a traditional "song". I've had to try to forgo the lyrics and concentrate on composing. I can read about music and garner useful information out of it, but when I read about making a SONG, i.e. words+music as the end product... I fall short, lol

It rather amazes me that someone can make something out of simply a couple of guitar strums, and softly humming some lyrics... and everyone goes crazy over it. MORE so than even listening to big classical numbers...

the engineer inside me simply marvels at this. It seems as if so "little" is being done, yet so much is being accomplished. Theres a brutal "efficiency", though thats not the right word, just, the one that comes to mind.

I mean... compare Beethoven's 5th to "name" by the goo goo dolls... thats a good example of what I mean.

trust me, I'm green with envy when yet another young kid seems to just strum about once every 5 seconds, in a simple 3-chord format to boot... and the singing is for the most part little more than talking over it... and it garners such accolades.

when I try to "grok" what is going on there... i want to be able to do THAT, and use it as a launching pad for "coloring it in" with my classical. When I pry more, I tend to get responses like:

"your, like, not telling the TRUTH, man......your not, like, really feeling it, man..."

LMAO

I just know that I am missing one or a couple fairly basic concept(s), which I shall blunder over eventually, then I will realize it has been staring me in the face all along, and bring it all together.
 
Can a hook or chorus just be a musical riff or instrumental? No, you still need some words, melody, etc. That's what makes people sing along and buy your record.

Well, I must disagree..."Baker Street" by Gerry Rafferty. The hook and the chorus are 100% instrumental! That's the only one I can think of, though.
 
I wish people would just take the word/concept of "hook" and throw it away. It's just plain ignorant - songs aren't written that way, except maybe by non-creative accountant types trying to figure out, by some step by step method, how to do what creative musicians do instinctively.

I have always thought that the whole concept of "a hook" was total, 100% bullshit.

Music is way, way more complicated, mysterious and ambiguous than that. "A hook" is a scientist trying to figure out a formula for art.

Figure out a song. Write out the parts. Then do another, then when you get to around 500 you'll see that there are no hooks. Every song is different and "made it" for a different reason. It has nothing to do with "hooks". There's parts that you can identify "there's the hook" but that is entirely the wrong type of thinking - you're using the wrong part of your brain.

It is so university thinking. :(
 
^ Agree with dintymoore ^

How many songs have a hook that gets into your brain pan, you can't stop humming or singing it.....but it's a shitty song? A great hook is one that you can't forget - but that sure doesn't make it a great (or even good) song.

-Mike
 
There are so many different kinds of songs. Songs of every description. And some of those songs contain hooks. And some of those hooks are deliberate. Sometimes, I'll write something and I just know that whoever's singing or my kids will like it. Hooks are the equivalent to the riff in heavy rock. Sometimes, those guys came up with riffs and just knew they'd be loved.
I agree that a greak hook doesn't necesarilly equate to a great song. Nor does a great riff or vocal or lead break or runout or beat.....
To base every song around a hook or to work on a hook then write a song around it every time to me is daft. To throw out any possibility of a hook or a hook being the start point of your song is equally so.
 
I am NOT a HOOKER!

I don't think of it so much as a hook, but more of a theme. It is the thread that holds the whole song together, and sets the overall idea for the lyrics. if the tune is integral, then it leads the rest of the songwriting process in a certain direction.

I frequently begin with a hook, and let the song build itself from there.

Not the first time I've been called that, though. :drunk:
 
My songs always start with Hooks or Choruses, it's just that what excites me to complete a tune. But coming up with fitting verses that do these hooks right is really tricky sometimes!

A good hook is usually in the rhythm, rarely do the lyrics make a difference unless it's a smart play of words (IMO). Ofcourse having overall good lyrical content people can relate to and send shivers down ones spine will definately get the listener more into the track. Again, this is just what I personally have found to be true.

I think OP gives some very valid points.
 
Back
Top