Good recording software

  • Thread starter Thread starter Victory Pete
  • Start date Start date
Victory Pete

Victory Pete

Banned
Hi
I just got a new HP computer and it came with a simple recording program. The problem I have with it is on playback it adds a "Whining" sound to my music. What is available that sounds good and has options?

Thanks

VP
 
Recording programs dont add whining sounds.... that's probably the 40-cent built-in soundcard on your computer.
(ALL built-in soundcards are made cheap for beeps, boops and gaming, dont be fooled when they call themselves 'high-def')

For a recording program, try Reaper. Lots of high-end features for a very low price.
For free you can also try Audacity.

To replace the gamer card on your computer, start here.
 
TimOBrien said:
Recording programs dont add whining sounds.... that's probably the 40-cent built-in soundcard on your computer.
(ALL built-in soundcards are made cheap for beeps, boops and gaming, dont be fooled when they call themselves 'high-def')

For a recording program, try Reaper. Lots of high-end features for a very low price.
For free you can also try Audacity.

To replace the gamer card on your computer, start here.
Click to expand...

My HP was over a $1000 and came with "Beats Audio".http://www.shopping.hp.com/webapp/s...slp/psg/desktops/High_performance/h8xt_series
How do you know if it is the sound card or not.

VP
 
The Reaper looks good for the price. Will there be a delay if I am playing along with something? My system now has an annoying delay.

VP
 
Telegram Sam said:
Is this thread for real?
Click to expand...

It's kind of puzzling, isn't it?

VP: The cost of a laptop is not an indicator of its suitability for recording. Most laptops (and desktops) come with general purpose soundcards, and as Tim notes above, these are low-cost devices that are not designed for duplex recording, hence the likelihood of unwanted noise and inherent delay (latency).

You need to look at PCIe cards (if you can fit one in) or external interfaces purpose-built for recording.

Trying to record using an inbuilt soundcard is like trying to get decent recordings out of a cassette walkman.
 
gecko zzed said:
It's kind of puzzling, isn't it?

VP: The cost of a laptop is not an indicator of its suitability for recording. Most laptops (and desktops) come with general purpose soundcards, and as Tim notes above, these are low-cost devices that are not designed for duplex recording, hence the likelihood of unwanted noise and inherent delay (latency).

You need to look at PCIe cards (if you can fit one in) or external interfaces purpose-built for recording.

Trying to record using an inbuilt soundcard is like trying to get decent recordings out of a cassette walkman.
Click to expand...

Yes, it is puzzling, I am no Computer expert. Thanks for your reply.

VP
 
Victory Pete said:
I am trying to get some information about recording with my new Computer.
Click to expand...
I think some of the response you've gotten may be due to the contempt you've shown digital recording, even recently.
However, you'll find a treasure trove of info here. It can be a bit of a learning curve, like anything else, but some people adapt quickly. You may well be one of them.
 
grimtraveller said:
I think some of the response you've gotten may be due to the contempt you've shown digital recording, even recently.
However, you'll find a treasure trove of info here. It can be a bit of a learning curve, like anything else, but some people adapt quickly. You may well be one of them.
Click to expand...

I am not sure "Contempt" is the right word. I think there is a place for both recording mediums. Obviously Digital has its place on the internet, that is where I am trying to expand to. In my Studio Analog is "King".

VP
 
Victory Pete said:
Can you please stop "Stalking" me. You know nothing about me. This is the first time I have ever posted in this section. I have no experience with computer recording nor soundcards. I am trying to gain useful information from thoughtful members who like to help instead of "Harass".

VP
Click to expand...

It's a complicated subject, if you are serious about it, I suggest you find a basic book on the subject, read up on it and then ask any questions you may have. Considering that you have decades of recording experience, it shouldn't be too hard. Reaper is supposed to be good software. And to answer your first question, you will need an external interface to convert your analogue inputs to digital in order to record them, (and to convert it back to analog when you are monitoring) if you don't want your efforts to sound whack.
 
Victory Pete said:
I am not sure "Contempt" is the right word. I think there is a place for both recording mediums. Obviously Digital has its place on the internet, that is where I am trying to expand to. In my Studio Analog is "King".

VP
Click to expand...

Don' turn it into an argument, if you want to learn it; learn it, otherwise don't.
 
Victory Pete said:
I am not sure "Contempt" is the right word. I think there is a place for both recording mediums. Obviously Digital has its place on the internet, that is where I am trying to expand to. In my Studio Analog is "King".
Click to expand...
I'll give you the benefit of the doubt on that, but some of your pronouncements down in the analog forum sounded pretty contemptuous to me. I don't think anyone sane has a problem with your preferences, it's just that some people have a way of stating their preferences in a way that seems to trash all others.
 
VP, if this thread's genuine then take the advice that's been given.
Built in audio = no good for pro (or amateur) recording, even if the computer was $10,000.

Delta 1010 is an entry level interface, but still hundreds of times better than any built in audio.
 
Telegram Sam said:
Don' turn it into an argument, if you want to learn it; learn it, otherwise don't.
Click to expand...

I didnt start the "Argument", you did.

grimtraveller said:
I'll give you the benefit of the doubt on that, but some of your pronouncements down in the analog forum sounded pretty contemptuous to me. I don't think anyone sane has a problem with your preferences, it's just that some people have a way of stating their preferences in a way that seems to trash all others.
Click to expand...

There are certain "Instigators" that seem to follow me around and start conflicts.

VP
 
I have the Delta 1010LT, and I've had a very good experience with mine. I have plenty of people tell me how nice my recordings are; they sometimes offer advice on production, EQ, etc., but I've never heard anyone say something like "but it would be better if you upgraded your audio card." I suspect this may be because I don't disclose the recording equipment unless it's asked for.
 
Reaper. Definitely Reaper. Though if you have a SoundCloud account you get Abelton Live Lite for free.
 
Victory Pete said:
Trolling?, I am trying to get some information about recording with my new Computer.

VP
Click to expand...

No, you're trolling.

No-one who knows as much about music and audio as you claim to would approach the topic in this fashion.
 
famous beagle said:
I have the Delta 1010LT, and I've had a very good experience with mine. I have plenty of people tell me how nice my recordings are; they sometimes offer advice on production, EQ, etc., but I've never heard anyone say something like "but it would be better if you upgraded your audio card." I suspect this may be because I don't disclose the recording equipment unless it's asked for.
Click to expand...

IK Obi said:
Reaper. Definitely Reaper. Though if you have a SoundCloud account you get Abelton Live Lite for free.
Click to expand...

Thanks for your helpful posts, I have Reaper now for a month free, and I am considering the Delta 1010LT.

VP
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top