Event 20/20 vs NS10ms

  • Thread starter Thread starter CyanJaguar
  • Start date Start date
C

CyanJaguar

New member
smokinjokin@one.net.au
Senior Member
Posts: 40
Registered: Jul 2000
posted 05-08-2001 01:33 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hey Everybody,
Just a quick question about monitoring - I have been using a pair of Event 20/20 Biamplified monitors for about three years now and I STILL cannot get good translation between control room and bedroom in my mixes. I listen and listen to commercial releases on them, and can never get what I mixed to be translated onto the consumers system. I have re-designed my mix room countless times with acoustic advice. They just seem to be too "nice" - they make me think it sounds good when there is still work to be done. But I have grown to like them for tracking, I can get good tones to tape with them; but mixing is just not happening for me on them.

I do, however, own a pair of NS10's. I left them to collect dust when I first got the Events, but now I am reconsidering their value in my setup. Quite a few Mastering engineers that have worked on my mixes suggest using them for mixdown, or at least setting them up for A/B comparison. I mean, SO MANY engineers still use them, at least a majority of engineers that I admire and respect and hope to emulate, in my own unique way. Just of the top of my head, I know that Bob Clearmontain uses NS10's for drum mixes - that could be old information but a lot of great work done by him in the past has been on the tens.

My question is, what is the industry standard for amplification of NS10's? I know amps can be as much of a personal choice as a vocal mike, but there must be a more common model that suits NS10's - if you could give me a ballpark figure of cost for your suggestion that would be appreciated. BTW I just read an article stating NS10's are no longer in production - do you predict they will be fetching hefty vintage prices in ten years???

Thanks for your advice - the EQ forum members will definitely get a mention in my ARIA speech.... (Australia's Grammys...kinda)

Adam B
SMOKIN & JOKIN RECORDING STUDIO - Sydney Australia
www.angelfire.com/music/smokinjokin

IP: Logged

Alison Waters
Member
Posts: 5
Registered: May 2001
posted 05-08-2001 01:47 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How are ya?! Not really going to answer your question but just let you we are in the same boat! I put my 10's in the garage a year ago and got KRK's and the new Mackie monitors. Problem is that I guess my 13 years of mixing on NS10's did something to me; I have finally got so fed up with mixes sounding so out of whack that I recently dusted them off. For a month now, I finally have got that old magic back! HA!
Cheers:
Jeff

IP: Logged

groundcontrol
Senior Member
Posts: 32
Registered: Apr 2001
posted 05-08-2001 02:36 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Adam,
IMO Event are NOT great speakers. Too much lo's and hi's and nothing where that counts! Actually the bi-amped model is not as bad as the others in the serie but still a far cry from a reference monitor for my money. You're definitely be in a better position with the NS10's. Personnally I love Auratones!

Anyway it's always a good idea to try and have at least a couple different sets to reference on. I usually use three. Including some really cheap computer speakers that I almost always run in mono with just on speaker actually. It's great for balances and fx to direct ratio.

Hope that helps.

Eric.

IP: Logged

groundcontrol
Senior Member
Posts: 32
Registered: Apr 2001
posted 05-08-2001 02:41 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As for amps, try some Bryston's if you can find them. It always worked with NS10's for me. A studio I used to work at had an H&H MOSFET 800 that sounded quite nice with the Yamaha's.
My 2 cents, Eric.

IP: Logged

studio@indentmusic.com.au
Member
Posts: 15
Registered: Oct 2000
posted 05-08-2001 05:53 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No I just sold my Events for the Krk V6 and Alesis sub.
You really notice the mid range now.
That is what is missing from the Events.
My mixes have translated a lot better since.
How are you going with all the gear purchases.
I am happy with the Buzz pre amp, been getting good remarks on it.
Would like another, but promised my self not to buy anything for 2 months. Then brought a Bass Pod. (keep away from shops). Have to save money.
Want to buy a place and not pay rent for home and studio.
So I need a deposit.


------------------
Bye Dave
www.indentmusic.com.au

IP: Logged

masternfool
Senior Member
Posts: 71
Registered: Mar 2001
posted 05-08-2001 08:43 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I used ns10s for a lot of years, got rid of the piercing boxes. I have been using genelec 1031a. For my smalls I have found nothing wrong with the alesis monitor1. They translate very well,I have even mastered projects on them.They are matched to the alesis amp. But for critical listening I always use the gens.
I also have a small pair of sonys from circuit city $100. for the pair!
have also used auratones but they just didn't have enough body to them.
My 2 cents, good luck..Harry

IP: Logged

Jon Atack
Senior Member
Posts: 536
Registered: Apr 2000
posted 05-08-2001 04:30 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I agree with you on ditching the Events.
For your NS10s, I'd start by listening to a Bryston 4B. I'm using a C-Audio RA2001 which is also excellent.

When mixing in my studio, I reference to Dynaudio BM15a's + BX30 sub, NS10s (with the older tweeters, which I prefer), a mono Auratone (although I bought a pair of them) also powered by the C-Audio, and a Sony boombox in the lounge.

I use the NS10s all the time for drum mixing, and overall rock mixes at lower dB levels.

Good luck with your speech!

Jon


IP: Logged

Chipotle
Member
Posts: 4
Registered: May 2001
posted 05-08-2001 05:14 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I've been happy with the results from my 20/20 bas lately. I'm surprised that so many people dislike them. May I inquire as to what aspect of your mixes are disappointing you? Also, what cables are you using to the Events? The right interconnects can make a substantial difference, as well as quality speaker stands.
IP: Logged

groundcontrol
Senior Member
Posts: 32
Registered: Apr 2001
posted 05-08-2001 06:47 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Excellent setup Jon! That's what I like to use too (minus the sub)!
Also one of the best performance/price ratio I have got in the past was from Peavey PRM308's. They will tear apart the Event's in a second!

As to the cable/stands thing...

Well since they're amplified boxes it should not be that hard to get a clean signal to them. Stands and placement issues are gonna affect any speakers anyway. Why don't you start with something that gives you back what you send to it in the first place?

My 2 cents, Eric.

IP: Logged

Chipotle
Member
Posts: 4
Registered: May 2001
posted 05-08-2001 10:09 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hello, Eric. The reason I mentioned cables & stands is that I noticed improvements from different cables and using well damped stands. Maybe these changes would be too subtle to help, but since those are the monitors he currently has it wouldn't hurt to try.
I haven't worked on all the monitors mentioned, but my Events definitely give back what I put in. Even though the question concerned amplification for NS-10's, I was curious as to the specific problems Adam was having with his mixes done on the Events, ie too bassy, bright, vocals/guitars/drums too loud, in the interest of possibly giving him a specific suggestion or perhaps learning of something to be wary of in my own mixes.

IP: Logged

Loco
Senior Member
Posts: 188
Registered: Aug 2000
posted 05-09-2001 12:36 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by smokinjokin@one.net.au:
> Just of the top of my head, I know that Bob Clearmontain uses NS10's for drum mixes - that could be old information but a lot of great work done by him in the past has been on the tens.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Just to cool you down, Bob and the Lord-Alge brothers use the NS-10 along with a Teledyne Subwoofer. And they listen most of the time from the Gens 1034/1038

Use whatever speaker you're familiar with, and one that won't lie to you. Personally I've found the Mackies and the Gens s30/1034 excellent references. I also have wired a pink&purple girl toy radio to the headphone system just to see if everybody will be able to hear the vocals and the snare.

IP: Logged

smokinjokin@one.net.au
Senior Member
Posts: 40
Registered: Jul 2000
posted 05-10-2001 03:24 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Well the response from this forum never ceases to thrill me - love having contact with you people to give me help and advice. . .
Now that a few people have mentioned it I tend to agree - the Events are exaggerated in the top and bottom - the midrange is defintely where my "translation" problem occurs. I listen to a lot of 90's alternate rock so I hear a very distinct "wall of guitars" in my head when I go to mix - I get it absolutely cranking on the Events, but take it home and play it on my passive 3 way hi-fi speakers and the guitars just turn to mush, and they drop down by at least 6db maybe more, along with everything else in the low mid range. Chipotle, I have tried getting good stands (it did help) and also gold plated balanced audio lines from the desk to the monitors. It definetly improved the balance, but still I have the above mentioned trouble. I am starting to think, after the comment from Jeff, that I have listened to passive speakers all my life, and while powered bi-amplified speakers may be superior to NS10's, I may not be accustomed to them - even though I have tried to get them to work for me over the past 3 - 4 years!

Dave, thanks again for your advice on my last question in the forum about what order of gear purchases I should follow to get out of my "project" studio sound. Dave, I printed out your advice and it is now a blueprint to what I get - very valuable email that one, my friend. Sounds like you are living my life right now, torn between existing on this planet and buying a new peice of pro audio gear... hey we should start a group lotto pool - seems the only way I'm gonna get to where I want before I'm 60.

Byrston amps seem to get the most votes so far for a good amp on NS10's - never heard of them - any ballpark figures on cost? Please state what currency. What is a good power rating for the tens? I have heard of some studios using very powerful amps on them and just dont turn them up too far (the claim is better transient response) - any thoughts?

Gotta say, my mate has a home setup with the Alesis monitor ones and they sounded real boxy - very dull too. He wasn't using an Alesis amp though. BUT his mixes translate pretty good... he does mostly electronic based music. Cheater.

Its funny how one persons ultimate hate is the other persons reliable standard? Here we have Chipotle saying they (events) are the most accurate monitor they have used - and if it works FOR YOU don't ever let someone tell you different. We also have Loco stating the Mackies are his standard reference. I auditioned the Events alongside the Mackies in the store and almost laughed aloud when I heard the comparison. And I have never seen a model of monitor that cops so much shit from this forum! But Loco and many other pro mixers use them - or did Mackie throw around some cash for comment??? I heard that Yamaha did the same thing when the NS10 came out, sending a pair to every big name facility that would be photographed in the near future. How many pro studio photos DONT have a pair of white cone NS10's in them?

Keep the amplifier recommendations comin!
Adam B
SMOKIN & JOKIN RECORDING STUDIO - Sydney Australia
www.angelfire.com/music/smokinjokin


IP: Logged

studio@indentmusic.com.au
Member
Posts: 15
Registered: Oct 2000
posted 05-11-2001 01:30 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Adam,
Try searching google.com for Usenet stuff on amps for the NS10's.
I am pretty sure there has been some threads here as well.
I actually liked my Passive 20/20 with my denon amp better then the bi-mped I tested when checking out speakers. Although the room was different.
After he Krk my next 2 picks were
Tannoy system 1000, Liked better then 800 although a little bid for nearfield.
and the Yamaha MSP10's were not bad as well.

I am going to a have a "where to now session" Tuesday night, I am renting small place. Would like to buy a larger place, just to expensive.
So I am going to re-vamp my place, maybe extensively, maybe just buy it?.




------------------
Bye Dave
www.indentmusic.com.au

IP: Logged

groundcontrol
Senior Member
Posts: 32
Registered: Apr 2001
posted 05-11-2001 03:55 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adam, there is nothing wrong per se with a bi-amped two-way design. There are plenty of great and very usable small monitor systems designed that way, the Events are just not one of them. Nor are the Mackies IMO. You'll just have to pay a bit more if you really want acceptable performance.
Just my opinion...

Eric

IP: Logged

dave-G
Member
Posts: 22
Registered: Apr 2001
posted 05-11-2001 02:45 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Perhaps more important than what amp you use is which brand of toilet paper you'll tape over the tweeters. In extensive double-blind and phase-cancellation tests, we found that pink Charmin yields the best results.
-dg


IP: Logged

jthomp@hotmail.com
Member
Posts: 1
Registered: Sep 2000
posted 05-14-2001 10:47 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hey Folks! I suggest checking out the Event PS8's. They are probably the most underatted monitors on the market. They have translated pefectly for me- I have mixed on most major monitors including the NS10's.
Peace

Jthomp
 
If you did not read the whole thing,

basically, the ns10ms are better than the events for mixing.

I have the same problem with my monitor twos. Even though they were compared to genelecs and proacs, and called the best monitors for under $1000,

THey sound too good. You let stuff slide by.

NOw I am hoping some dumb bastard will put his ns10ms on ebay for like $100 so that I can buy them.
 
I'm sorry... there's NO excuse for not learning how to translate mixes.

The truth to the whole monitor thing is that it is COMPLETELY subjective. I hate NS-10s (I tried 'em for a long time and couldn't make 'em work for me...) but I LIKE my Events. An engineer is going to spend a lot of time listening to those monitors - they may as well enjoy them!

There's no question, some monitors are going to be better than others in terms of getting a mix to sit right - problem is, whatever is making them better is going to vary from person to person. Brand X may take less "learning time" for one engineer, much longer for another.

A recent article in EQ on the demise of the NS-10s included many pro's opinions on them... one of them in particular caught my attention - Mick Guzauski made a comment about using them, but it was neither "fun" nor "enjoyable" for him.

Bottom line - shouldn't the listening process be at the very least enjoyable??? If you are hearing crap sound, even though you know the rationale reason behind it, are you going to really put your heart into it, regardless of what your ears are telling you??

SO.......... my take on monitors - use whatever turns you on, whatever makes it "fun" for you, just remember to learn how to translate your mixes on them properly and you should do just fine. If you can't get good mixes out of whatever you use, you haven't learned them well enough yet!

My NS-10 use is a case in point - if I had been willing to spend MORE time learning them, I would have gotten decent mixes on them too. Problem is, my ears got too tired of listening before I got to that point!

Bruce
 
hey bruce,

I don't think that the listening process should be fun if the result is no fun. monitors are a tool. If I want nice, I listen on my home speakers, and if I want accurate, I would like to listen on studio monitors.


As far as learning to translate mixes, I think thats a big fat joke that most people make. We know what sounds like what on our system, but when it comes to taking 10 tracks and balancing them, we are still going to make them sound pleasing to our ears.

So if a person knows that his system is bass heavy, it makes no differecne when he is mixing. He mixes till it sounds good, hence the poor translation.
 
Event = Mud

NS10M=Crystal Clear

I have several engineer friends that would say that anyone using Event monitors would be considered instantly NON pro. I have a very close friend that did a Major project at his studio and the Post production engineer (Joe Costa) would not even listen to the tracks because he was using Events LOL
He had to go out and buy a pair of Tannoys to even get him to listen.. Sure the NS10s are not pretty sounding BUT I don't want to let shit slide when I mix, you might want too but I don't. There are many options out there that would be better to start with than the NS10 but you won't make a mistake by using them. Oh and as far as ear fatigue WTF is up I listen for hours at a time and don't get any more or less on those than I do other speakers. Funny they are still teaching students at SAE and other schools with NS10s ?

BTW NS10s are meant to be used Nearfield to listen to a mix if you want pretty sounding listen to your final mix with a sub or other speakers..


Like I said there are a ton of options out there for Nearfields but I wouldn't even list Event as one of the bottom end.
 
It's an old thread yet I still like to comment. I really can get into the comment about not wanting shyt to slide while you mix,
using monitors that "sound good for listening pleasure as well".

question: why pay so much for monitors then (like event 20/TR8/Mackie),
when some good flat response inexpensive monitors can do the trick too when translating?

Im a beginner when it comes to monitoring. I made pretty good quick things on some crappy old sansui home hifi set boxes. That translated well on "full frequency PA monitors"
I still wonder why that is.
 
Most people who use NS-10's usually have other sets of speakers to work with, so it is not like they just use them by themselves. I have found that the NS-10's work great when trying to get a good balanced mix. When I am tracking, I like to use my JBL's to get the source right.

Even with those two set of speakers, I like to take my mixes to other systems to see how well they sound outside of the studio.
 
Try a Yamaha PL 1600 Amp for your NS-10's. I just bought this amp from a local studio that was using it to drive their NS-10's. The NS-10's were for sale as well but passed on them, I now wish I hadn't. If yours are still in good shape HANG ON TO THEM.
 
I also got a pair of 10M's stored in a box. I bought them on ebay like 5 years ago. They sounded horrific so I put them away for future use :D

BTW. Is there a quick way to check if the speaker is still in good shape as supposed to be?
I mean the Bass sounded like a cardboard box, the mids were too much and the highs just awfull.. Does this sound like NS10 in good shape?
 
There's a nice little essay about the NS10 on the last page of the newest issue of "Recording" mag. It seems that the guy who designed it recently died, and the article pays tribute to his work. Like Fishmed mentions above, the engineer who wrote the article expressly notes that few people ever used the NS10s as their main monitors--just too painful for that. As second- or third-check monitors that approximate the limited sound of a typical small stereo, the NS10 was/is certainly helpful to scores of studios, according to him. I've never had the pleasure nor pain to try them.

J.
 
What I have been told by many professionals in the recording industry (both old school and new school) is that the yamaha's are very very good for doing final mixdowns. The reason these monitors made such a huge impact on the recording industry back in the day and are still widely used today is that when you get a mix to sound good on these speakers, chances are it's going to sound very good on the average consumer's stereo. I'm talking cd players in the car, boombox stereos, and low-mid range home theater setups.
 
NS10 Speakers

If you're not happy with your NS10 sound, I recommend replacing the woofers or tweeters (sometimes they can be blown). This place is the cheapest online:

prodataplus.com
 
Back
Top