I discovered something I thought was a little weird about vocal frequencies.
I'm recording a friend's band and last weekend we were mixing one of the songs. We decided to play with some EQ on the singer's vocal track. I'm still pretty green and the EQ is completely trial and error for me. So I start playing with the sliders to get an idea of what frequencies are most important for the vocals. The first one I slide down is 1000HZ and BAM! his vocals are practically invisible. Of course, they aren't invisible, but you can barely hear them. Most of this guy's vocal content is at 1k. I can completely kill his vocals by cutting 900-1100HZ, but almost all of it is at 1k.
Anyway I was playing around last night to see if this holds true for other voices. I have recorded two other singers with the same mic and I tried the same EQ on their tracks. To my surprise it didn't have the same effect on the two other singers. I could still hear their voices. Granted, completely attenuating 1k killed alot of their vocals but it wasn't NEARLY as dramatic as this other guy. And they both had content beyond the 900-1100HZ range.
So I was wondering, is this common? I know there is a certain range for the human voice (I don't know what it is), but is it common for the human voice to have such a narrow frequency response (if that's what you call it)?
Cheers!