Does any anyone export to samplitude too mix

  • Thread starter Thread starter Killah_Trakz
  • Start date Start date
K

Killah_Trakz

Who Cares!
Im an avid nuendo user, and ive been using the samplitude demo and im liking like its over all sound. But the learning curve is a little steep and i find nuendo's editing more i lamans terms. I wanted to export via opentl or omf than edl translate via edl and mix on samplitude after all my editing on nuendo is done. But here's where my problem lies should i first record in samplitude to gain its summing function (sound) transfer to nuendo (edit) than back to Samp for mixing?
 
Killah_Trakz said:
Im an avid nuendo user, and ive been using the samplitude demo and im liking like its over all sound.


Wait what....you like the way one software mixing enviroment sounds more then the other....you do realize thats impossible...
 
i dont know maybe im tone def

but yeah, ive been comparing nuendo to samplitude. And too me nuendo has always had this midrangy mushyness to me.
 
Killah_Trakz said:
but yeah, ive been comparing nuendo to samplitude. And too me nuendo has always had this midrangy mushyness to me.


I am sorry to burst your bubble but it has nothing to do with the enviroment its self.....are you sure your not referring to the stock plug-ins offered...
 
dont use stock plugins

no im not using any stock plugins. I have tried through 3 different software and each has a different sound, which were ptle, samp 8, and nuendo 3.
 
I don't know what to tell man....its all in your head....there is no diffrence.
 
chadsxe said:
I don't know what to tell man....its all in your head....there is no diffrence.

there is. since software mixing or summing is a mathematical process, different algoritms in different softwares will give different results ---> different sounds.
 
Yep. Just listen to the same CD or Wave file through Real Player, Windows Media Player, and Winamp with no effects or eqs turn on, and let me know if you hear no difference.
 
There is a difference between DAWs. It's in the details, like pan law,etc... but the summing buss of different DAWs do sound different.
 
faderbug said:
there is. since software mixing or summing is a mathematical process, different algoritms in different softwares will give different results ---> different sounds.


This is true. However, if you are to the level that the different summing algorithms are "messing up your sound" you best have a string of platinum records on the wall. Mike Shipley uses Nuendo, and he does.......

Why did you drop $1600 on Nuendo in the first place? You must do video post work, no? I don't believe samplitude can do that, or does it?
 
I don't know about algorithyms and all that stuff, but majority of the built in plugins suck ass in samplitude.
 
impossible my ass...


ever heard a Reason song on it's own, and then rewired into Cubase SX?
 
No disrespect, but could you please name one Software DAW (other than SAW Studio maybe) that has built in effects that are better than the ones that come with samplitude.
Now the presets in Samplitude may not be that great, but if you actually know how to use a delay, compressor, etc, you can get great results with stock plugins.
 
The only thing that should necessarily sound exactly the same from one DAW to another is a straight wave file recorded in, then played back, no EQ, no compression, no processing whatsoever. Outside of that, yes, they are different. As far as Samplitude's effects, dynamics, Eq's, etc., they are quite good. Just as a have a whole cabinet of spices in my kitchen, I have various other plugins to season with..... but if I had to mix with only Samplitude's software fx, I wouldn't blink an eye.
 
Back
Top