W
wombar
New member
Hi All,
I've got to a point in my recording now where I think it's going to be really useful to have some nice monitors but have some doubts. Before anyone asks, I totally understand a monitor is meant to convey the "true" sound of a mix and therefore give you a better chance of getting a good sound on a range of systems.
However, my dad has just invested in some pretty good home cinema kit(Kef Q series speakers and a high end Denon amp) and the music on this system sounds incredible and most importantly clear. This has got me thinking about whether I need monitors at this point in time.
Now instead of spending £1000 on a pair of Mackie 824's, could I get away with spending that money(more like £600) on a very nice amp and separate speakers? Am I right in assuming you can't really listen to monitor speakers as everyday speakers?
I've listened to a few hi-fi speakers with monitoring in mind and I've found some fairly good ones which appear to be nicely balanced with an amp for about £600 which is much more appealing because I can EQ them to be relatively flat when mixing and turn the EQ back on for films etc.
Basically my speakers need upgrading and I'd like some that I can use for everyday tasks(films, music etc) as well as recording. The Mackies and Genelecs sounded great but I don't think they'd be too happy with everyday tasks.
At the end of the day, whatever I end up buying is going to be an improvement over my creative speakers which are horrible, but I don't want to scupper myself without getting some opinions from other people who have already been in this situation.
I know there are going to be a lot of people saying I need monitors but I guess I really need a bit of convincing. If I bought the Mackies I could rest easy knowing I've got the only monitors I'm likely to need unless I start making some serious money out of music.
Anyway, it's up to you guys to talk me round I guess
I've got to a point in my recording now where I think it's going to be really useful to have some nice monitors but have some doubts. Before anyone asks, I totally understand a monitor is meant to convey the "true" sound of a mix and therefore give you a better chance of getting a good sound on a range of systems.
However, my dad has just invested in some pretty good home cinema kit(Kef Q series speakers and a high end Denon amp) and the music on this system sounds incredible and most importantly clear. This has got me thinking about whether I need monitors at this point in time.
Now instead of spending £1000 on a pair of Mackie 824's, could I get away with spending that money(more like £600) on a very nice amp and separate speakers? Am I right in assuming you can't really listen to monitor speakers as everyday speakers?
I've listened to a few hi-fi speakers with monitoring in mind and I've found some fairly good ones which appear to be nicely balanced with an amp for about £600 which is much more appealing because I can EQ them to be relatively flat when mixing and turn the EQ back on for films etc.
Basically my speakers need upgrading and I'd like some that I can use for everyday tasks(films, music etc) as well as recording. The Mackies and Genelecs sounded great but I don't think they'd be too happy with everyday tasks.
At the end of the day, whatever I end up buying is going to be an improvement over my creative speakers which are horrible, but I don't want to scupper myself without getting some opinions from other people who have already been in this situation.
I know there are going to be a lot of people saying I need monitors but I guess I really need a bit of convincing. If I bought the Mackies I could rest easy knowing I've got the only monitors I'm likely to need unless I start making some serious money out of music.
Anyway, it's up to you guys to talk me round I guess
