antman said:
difference between hard limit and compression? and i use adobe audition...... is there one that is preffered??
The difference...(in my own words and trying to keep-it-simple-stupid)
A compressor simply reduces signal strength. More specifically, it can target and reduce only the loudest peaks of a recorded signal. Compressors use threshold and ratio settings to base decisions on when and how much to reduce. Any part of the signal that exceeds a given threshold gets reduced (turned down) by an amount specified by the ratio. Any part that does not exceed the threshold is left (hopefully) unchanged.
Example of 3:1 ratio – if the incoming signal goes over the threshold by say 10db then it, (effectively, what appears to be the part above the threshold) is reduced by a factor of 3. (Knowing that 10 divided by 3 equals roughly 3.333,) The signal will be brought down to a level so only 3.333db remains above the threshold instead of 10db. In other words, this ratio specifies that if the input is 3 over, then the output can only be 1 over. If the input is 9 over, then the output can only be 3 over. Hence, a reduction of 3 to 1.
Example of 8:1 ratio - if the incoming signal goes over the threshold by 8db then it is reduced by a factor of 8, leaving the signal with only 1db over the threshold instead of 8.
Once all of this peak reduction has taken place, the overall volume level (output) can easily be increased to a higher ceiling, making the recorded track sound louder.
A limiter does similar work but does not need a ratio because any part of the signal that exceeds the threshold is reduced completely down to the threshold point. In other words, all signal level is limited by the threshold, hence the name.
This type of dynamics control is generally a good thing but, can sometimes produce undesirable results. You still have to rely on your ears to apply compression/limiting effectively.
(Note: if the ratio on a compressor is turned to its maximum, it will behave like a limiter.)