7 devices per controller. Some cards will have multiple controllers, especially if they support multiple SCSI standards.
If your machine supports 30 devices it would mean that you either have 4 SCSI controllers and a single IDE controller or 3 SCSI controllers and 4.5 IDE controllers.
Regardless, the number of supported devices is a big plus when it comes to SCSI. I still don't feel that it's worth the money though. I can pay $30/GB or $8/GB...seems pretty clear now that 7200 RPM drives are so cheap...and 10,000RPM EIDE lurking right around the corner.
And performance? Hmm. Let's think about that. A low latency 7200 RPM EIDE drive will sustain transfers of 33MB/sec. No it will not reach 66MB/sec as the ATA/66 controller manufacturers would like you to think. Some day, yes..today no. You will see bursting at very high rates, but no sustained....blah blah. Let's just look at 33MB/sec which a 7200RPM drive can easily manage...and let's look at it in a situation where you're recording at 24/96:
24bits * 96,000 = 2304000 bits / 8 = 288KB/sec. Wow, a lot! Or is it?
33,000KB (33MB) / 288 = 114.5
On a perfect system that is only limited to hard drive performance, a 7200 RPM UDMA/33 drive should allow you to record 114 tracks at one time before it starts to completely choke out.
SCSI would allow you to record 300 or so tracks at one time, but I think we're getting into the silly range here.
It is my opinion that you will see the effects of CPU, bus, and soundcard lag before you'll ever see disk lag with a good drive. Of course you'd have to have one of those awesome 8-output 120-input soundcards that haven't been invented yet. They rock.
For real life recording information on this subject head over to
www.prorec.com and do some searching on the subject. (sorry to mention your competition dragon but they do have some good articles there..and their BBS will NEVER compare to this one)
Slackmaster 2000