S
snedman1
New member
Any use one of these? Or do you get a rough idea and then port it to your computer?
mjbphotos
Moderator
Depending on what you are trying to record and what you are trying to accomplish with the computer, make your decision- do it all on the computer, or use a stand-alone recorder like the BR series.
S
snedman1
New member
I agree with that. My problem is I have used a computer before and the learning curve is sometimes more than I can handle - maybe I'm just lazy.
mjbphotos
Moderator
The BOSS BR series makes multi-track recording very easy, so that may be your best choice. Just use the computer to dupe CDs!
7
72fender
New member
I have a BR-600 & BR-1600, plus Reaper with a Edirol UA-4FX, the BR recorders are easier. With the BR-900, it has a CD burner built-in, no computer needed for mixdown.
If you want to save money, get the BR-600. It's great for quick song ideas recording. I used the BR-600 for writing songs, my band is recording our next CD with BR-1600.
You can hear a surf rock song I recorded with my BR-600 here http://soundclick.com/share?songid=6818279.
If you want to save money, get the BR-600. It's great for quick song ideas recording. I used the BR-600 for writing songs, my band is recording our next CD with BR-1600.
You can hear a surf rock song I recorded with my BR-600 here http://soundclick.com/share?songid=6818279.
Gorty
New member
I use the BOSS BR1600 CDR to track, edit, mix and master. I then transfer the wav file to the computer to create a song list folder and use the Windows or Nero program to burn the CD's.
The BOSS unit is painfully slow compared to the computer when it comes to burning CD's.
The BOSS unit is painfully slow compared to the computer when it comes to burning CD's.
MiamiMike
Musician - Composer
I use a BR-900CD to record tracks and then do the mixing with software. For me, it's easier to be able to "see" the tracks on a monitor when doing any edits, punch-ins and mixing, etc. 