Yeah, it's kind of hard to understand what somebody means by something they post if they don't explain, right?
By posting the Aurora video, I meant this: There's no way a manufactured voice could come anywhere near to something as good and powerful and beautiful and moving as this Aurora track is.
If I was going to use tech to manufacture a female voice out of my own, I would be okay with it as long as I made it perfectly clear what I was doing and why I was doing it. So, for example, if I wrote a song about a guy exploring his own feminine side by dialoguing with those parts of himself, I would be okay using a machine voice to take one side of the dialogue. And I might autotune the crap out of it to let the listener know what was going on. I'd be creative and playful with it, but I wouldn't do a machine voice and try to pass it off as a real female singer.
That's my attitude to the new stuff. But each of us is going to have to work out their own relationship to it and their own standards. Back in the day when FL Studio was called Fruity Loops, I really got into it and had a blast manufacturing beats and even put together a song or two with it. But I abandoned it when I got the strong impression that the mechanicality of it produced a music that was relatively lifeless compared to, say, the music of Louis Armstrong. The proof's in the pudding, as they say. YMMV