911 Vox! 911!!
That was your 911th post!
"How can that be?..
I can understand better materials making the storage more stable and longer lasting, but how can one media sound better than another when they are both limited to 16 bit?...
By the way meshuggah, im not challenging you on this... Im seriously asking out of my own curiousity..
I have been told that digital is digital and there are no variances in sound quality between cdr's... the only sifferences is ability to play on lots of machines and longer more stable storage with the better cd's"
Vox...
Meshuggah is correct in one respect. CDR's with different
dye types have different sonic profiles...
There are 4 dye types which come to mind. Cyanine, Phthlocyanine, Azo and this new black type. All do have slightly different responses because of the way the laser burns the dye layer. I haven't read much about the new black dye but of the other 3 - Phthalocyanine is the best sounding. The reason is melting point of the dye. Azo and Cyanine types have higher melting points and therefor are actually melted. This leads to higher error rates and slightly effected sonic response due to rounded edges the laser must interpret during reading.
Phthalocyanine dye on the other hand has a lower melting point and is actually burst vs melted. This yields square edges which are better read by the laser during playback.
I know it sounds strange but it is true. Burn a cyanine type and a Mitsui (phthlocyanine) and listen on a high end stereo. You will hear a slightly more pronounced - warmer low end.
I shit you not.
zipah >>
ps - Bite me dough boy...

LOL