
TASCAM MAN
New member
Just wondering if there is anybody in the USA making recording tape in the USA??

I think usrecordingmedia.com is an ATR dealer. Note that AFAIK, they only make the +10 2 mil tape, which may or may not be suitable for the decks you are using. There should be threads about this in the analog forum. Also, I think they put out a feeler about making a "hifi" 1mil tape. There is a discussion about that in the analog forum and more details I think at the tapeheads forum. I'd suggest having this topic moved to the analog forum though.
ATR Megnetics indeed. They have a bunch of dealers, just google it and you'll have all the options laid out in front of you. You can also buy direct from them if you like.
ATR is excellent sounding tape, like, really good, but it does run quite dirty on my 1" machine, I suggest getting some extra swabs and 99% alcohol and checking your tape path frequently while you use it.
It's apparently normal for this stuff. It's considered a +10.5 tape and there's plenty of extra oxide too run off. It's pretty quiet stuff so can be set up for +6 too. i hot it at
I haven't had excessive shedding probs with 499 either, or GP9. I found that you do have to a little excess off the GP9 with a couple fast wind passes, but that's the worst of it.
I've given ATR a second chance after my first experience turned out to be a bad batch, but the replacement only runs a little cleaner, still disruptive. I'm going to contact ATR about it when my current ATR project wraps, it's too bad it's running so dirty because it really is superb sounding tape when it isn't gooping oxide diarrhea all over the tape path...
I'm not honestly sure how well ATR would work on the MSR-24 anyway, it's not really intended for narrow-track machines.
I'm running RMGI SM911 on my MSR-24. No shedding (curiously I have had occasional shedding issues on the TSR-8).
I'm not honestly sure how well ATR would work on the MSR-24 anyway, it's not really intended for narrow-track machines.
Why wouldnt ATR (a brand of tape) not manufacture a tape that would suit the MSR24???![]()
Because their target market was high-end professional machines which can handle a very high operating level (ATR tape was originally specced as +11 tape IIRC), e.g. Studer, Ampex and Otari multitracks or stereo mastering decks.
Not all machines can actually bias up that high and the TASCAM machines like the TSR and MSR series were intended to run +6 tape (456, SM911 or other equivalents). Maybe the MSR-24 can run at nearly double its factory specified operating level, maybe not. You'd likely get a lot more crosstalk if you did.
Alternatively, you could just leave the machine set to +6 and see what happens if it's fed ATR tape. It might work quite nicely, but I don't think that's how the tape is designed to be used (I could be wrong - haven't tried it).
My gut feeling is that left calibrated to 456/911, the response would be nonlinear and that would skew the DBX encode/decode process. That said, I haven't yet noticed any issues when running 499 or SM900 on my TSR-8.
EDIT: But the bottom line is, SM911 is a lot closer to what the MSR-24 is supposed to use