Are there any pros/cons to using two mics for....

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rags
  • Start date Start date
R

Rags

New member
two mics for vocals and/or acoustic guitar tracks (possibly some electric guitar from the amp aswell)...two mics opposed to one

I record rap songs and aswell as soft acoustic songs like beck, staind kinda acoustic stuff...

I don't have a booth, i just record in open space for the time being...I have a roland vs840, and I have two condenser mics...i was gonna put the mics at different lengths from where I'm at just so maybe it will have an additional chorusey sound to it
 
sometimes when i record acoustic gutiars I use 2 mics... 1 near the 4th and 5th frets and one near the 12th pointing towards the body a bit. Then I usually pan or mix ... this way you get a nice warm sound and a nice stringy clear sound. Then you can do pretty much whatever you want with that. Nice to have both tracks to work with.
 
Whenever you use more than one mic on a source you open yourself up to possible phase problems. Make sure you know what an out of phase mic sounds like and how to check for it (hint: put it in mono and listen). That being said multiple mics is an important technique that everyone should master, but know when to use a single mic.

For example, most overheads or room mics are done in pairs--definately check those for phase carefully. But that is just one example of many. I often use two mics (over and under) for snares and 90% of the time I have to put a phase inverter on the under mic... no big deal. However, make sure that your phase inverter doesn't move things out of phase... the cardinal rule is to listen.

Personally I use multiple miking techniques on a LOT of stuff, or at least multiple sources combined with a mic or two. In general I do this:

Kick drum: two mics--one near beater, one almost outside of drum. When mixing I can balance the click to the boom to get what I need for each song. Pretty versatile technique.

Snare: two mics, one under and one over. Same deal as the kick, I will choose the relative volume levels during mixing on a song per song basis depending on how much crack versus how much body I need.

Guitar amps: generally I stick a dynamic (SM7 or SM57) about 6" from the grill off-axis and another mic (cardoid condenser, usually large diaphragm) about 6' away aimed more at the middle of the cabinet... lately an AKG 414BULS when I can get my greasy mitts on one.

Acoustic guitar: I get more elaborate for this because capturing a good acoustic guitar sound isn't easy. You need a good player and a good guitar with a good room, using quality mics in optimal placement to really nail this. At first this is a harrowing experience when you are starting out! I usually point a small diapragm condenser towards the butt end of the guitar and another pointing more towards the 12th-15th fret. I've used SM81's (a bit too bright), C2000's (bright but meaty) and Rode NT1's (a bit thin) in the past. So far I haven't nailed it. If the guitar has a preamp system I will record that too and might use it or I might not, depending on what's what.

Bass guitar: I'll only use one mic on the amp (RE20, MD421 or AKG D112... MD421 is my current favorite) and mix it with a direct signal. I've DI'd it straight before but am warming up to devices like the Sansamp RBI. For mixing this the direct signal is usually the low end and the amp will provide most of the tone.

Piano: I haven't mic'd a lot of pianos for recording (because I'm a synth geek and have digital and analog synths all over the place) but I have done it for some live performances I did sound for locally. You definately want at least two mics, and I recommend using a small diaphragm condenser.
 
I love stereo miking, especially for any acoustic instrument. By itself, an acoustic guitar sounds 1000 percent better to me with a couple of mics on it than mono. In a dense mix that isn't necessarily the case though. One of the things you learn about mixing is that, contrary to what seems to make sense, that every instrument and vocal should be made to sound their best when soloed, and then mix them together, that in fact it's often the case that individual tracks need to be thinned out for them to not overcrowd the mix. So sometimes the mono acoustic track that doesn't sound as good by itself is the one that works best in the mix. I always record both stereo and mono acoustic guitar takes and then decide which, or how much of each to use during mixdown.

Regards, RD
 
Rags said:
i was gonna put the mics at different lengths from where I'm at just so maybe it will have an additional chorusey sound to it

you are on to something here. yes, this works and works quite well (although not really as a "chorusey" effect). one up close mic, one far mic for vocals... the far one will add more room sound to your voice. you can mix it with the other vocal in a cool way, like automate it up on the chorus and bring it down for the verse...

you can use it to give a sense of "z axis" sound, as in forward and back in the speakers... very difficult effect to pull off, but it will give your recording some depth (literally). very effective technique.

otherwise, listen to cloneboy, very sound advice.
 
One good technique that will definately get around any phase issues is to use an omni and either a hyper-/super- or just cardioid in coincident spacing (right next to each other). The omni will sound two times the distance as the hypercardioid(super-1.9 and cardioid-1.7 the distance). You must have a decent sounding space to try this as the omni will pick up everything! This will give you two phase coherent sounds to blend or pan left and right giving you considerable options!
 
Back
Top