Well, I am, except for three things.
Downside -
1. The Fostex preamps are not as good as what I have right now (Mackie preamps) and I'm looking for something better.
2. The Fostex is limited to 16 bit depth / 44.1 sampling rate. Although a final master to CD will convert anything to 16 / 44.1, the advantage of the others is that all manipulation of the signal is done at a much higher bitrate (if that's the right term) - at about four times the resolution (or better). With the AKAIs, I can capture the signal at 28 / 88.2 and still have resources left. If I am doing one voice and one instrument, I can do the whole thing at 28 / 96. So the signal that eventually gets converted to 16 / 44.1 is better to begin with and the weak link of the chain is found only at the very end - in the CD/R disc itself.
3. The VF 160 EQ is missing a basic spectrum - the lower frequencies. If I'm going to try to master on the unit, that's the biggest problem of all.
Upside:
1. Jeez, willya look what you get for a thousand bucks!
2. Hit the ground running with it.
3. Reputation as tough and reliable.
4. Nearly unsurpassed .wav file archiving and management, especially with the onboard ADAT optical interface. This is an open architecture. I can keep using n-track without a hitch. (OK, so I have to reinstall that $35.00 Hoontech digital card. Big deal).
So I'd have to concede that for pure value, the VF160 seems to be the top of the heap. And if the money becomes the determining issue, I might end up with one - it sure would be an improvement over what I'm doing now. I think I would have to get a couple of preamps, and that's still about a hundred bucks a channel.
But first I'm nosing around for sonic perfection... and we'll see what happens when the calculator kicks in with the bad news.