Another post
Just wanted to add my two cents...I know it'll probably be slightly off topic, but i figured it would be constructive twist to this conversation!
When people start playing live all the time they find a sound with their equipment that sounds good (to their ears of course) at a volume to play/practice with... This is something they get used to as it gives them a certain instrument "response" that they also get used to and its hard when they go into a studio to convince them to deviate from it... They devolop the sound around these types of factors and when you ask them to compromise for the sake of the recording it can be asking too much... They can't play their instrument in the same manner and this can be hard for a band doing a demo to work around... As a recording musician I can appreciate the effect that these kind of compromises can have on your recording, ear, and playing, etc., but from their point of view it is definitely understandable!!!!
Depending on the setup there may be some ways to work around it, but sometimes there seems to be very little... They have to understand that its going to be a little different or you could tell them that they'll have to sacrifice quality to some extent by using room mic techiniques...
UNLESS some of the recording experts can share some helpful insight when we come into these situations, but in my opinion its going to depend on the recording environment, equipment, setup, etc... Hopefully someone here will give us some insight...