Sure, get the 133MHz, it's not much more $ at the moment. I really don't think it's gonna make much difference - from an upgrade perspective. If for instance, your building a system based of the BX chipset, which is 100MHz FSB - buying 133MHz, well sure why not, it's only about $5 more per 64MB. But, by the time you do upgrade, the 133MHz ram will have been replaced by something new, DDR or something. 66MHz bus is still pretty common, and quite capable. Performance increase between 66 and 100, not that big a deal, 66 and 133, maybe a bit but not ground breaking.
133 FSB is a scam. Intels botched chipset supports 133MHz, I suppose the Athlons will run at 133 overclocked... (200MHz FSB crap - maybe someday, but not at the moment). If you want 133MHz the only real chipset choice is the VIA, but then your risking potential problems that non-intel chipsets are famous for. Stuck in 100MHz for the moment, these are trying times.
Personally, I would like to see the software end of things improve. We have the horsepower at the moment, but bloated applications and OS's (including W2K, the most bloated of them all as far as install size). I know they can do better (programmers), but we are a small crowd.
[This message has been edited by Emeric (edited 07-12-2000).]