Search results

*Sigh*. What you claimed was that digital sounds bad becauase it only records one parameter of the sound. Well, so does analog: It only records one parameter of the sound. (The same parameter, even). Trying to avoid this by word games is not gonna get you anywhere. So? Well, obviously it can...

You persiste in your namecalling. I also note that your fantasies about who I am, and how I think, are still pathetically incorrect. Do you want a mudslinging fight? I may not be as good at them as I am on understanding analog or digital electronics (despite my complete lack of diplomas), but...

Well, first of all I run external reverbs. :D Second of all I run a AMD Athlon 2400+, some bog standard ASUS motherboard, don't remember what graphics card I have, a measly 512 MB of memory (I need more) and an M-Audio 1010LT soundcard. Some 5-7 tracks of audio, with maybe a compressor or two...

!/$ (bang per buck) Whatever is the most bang per buck for normal computers, really. :) I'm using a computer that by now is three years old, not specially made for DAW, and I am hard pressed to use up anything more than a couple of percentages of CPU, and the harddisk is full of episodes of...

Yes. A headphone extention cord is probably the easiest way to go.

Correct. Did I claim otherwise? No. Read my post again. Do you have anything to support that claim?

Of cursen you don't. Lack of knowledge of how this works will not kill you. So you don't need it. As I said, it's a question of wanting to know or not. You obviously rather stay unknowing. That's fine by me, but then you shouldn't pretend to know what you are talking about. If you misconceptions...

No, again that's based on misunderstandings. The minimum "delay" between two signals that digital can reproduce is not dependant on the samplerate. It is a function of the samplerate vs the number of levels there is in a sample. so 44*16 should be able to accurately represent a delay between two...

Correct. Eh. No. Hearing and Nyquist frequenci-.es have no connection. Yes, which is why lossy compression works. Which is a topic that has nothing to do with what is discussed here. Of course. And speakers amplifiers and microphones is about reproducing the pressure variations as accurately as...

Yes. i see that you still are not ready to learn. To bad. I'll tell you how the replicating is done when you change that attitude. Before that it is a waste of time.

Total and utter bullshit. The problem here is that you pretend to understand the issue, and pretend to understand us, when in fact you understand neither. And that would be OK, if you didn't at the same time have this attitude that we have nothing to add. You want to know how digital audio...

Sure it does, you just don't like the answer. Yeah, but it isn't less relevsnt, just as the playback process in analog innot less relevant. It doesn't matter how great your recordings are if you can't play them back. The reproduction process is just as important as the recording process. If you...

My very limited experience in the mic pre department is that cheap mic pres tend to colour the sound a lot. Which means that they are very useful in a limited area, and that this very much also depends on the microphone. For example: On the guitar test, you used an SM57. The SM57 has a dedidely...

Never. Did I say that? No. OK, thanks for telling me that a wise man should not waste time trying to understand what you say. Being less than wise, it's not obvious to me, I thought you wanted to say something.

Ok, lets split this up into two parts. part a: "Without trickery of human brain's design the entire digital technology is useless gigantic dumpster of switches." This is simply false. There is no human brain trickery involved. part b: You seem to use statements "trickery of human brain's...

Instead of making a complete fool out of yourself by implying that I have trouble grasping the abstract (ridicolous), why don't you just explain what this means: "From all the trickery of human brain's design (from programming, from hundreds of sets of commands and rules on how to 'manipulate...

Have fun fighnting those windmills.

The heart of it is incoherent and makes no sense? Oookeyyy... if you say so... :(

sigh. No, it's not "fixed" or "patched". It aint broken in the first place. It's not more broken than a zipe file of a picture is broken. It will still just look like noise if you look at it in a picture viewer without unpacking it. I'm sorry, this part of you post makes no sense to me, I have...

Possibly, but the beginning of the article is so full of bad and incorrect information, so I couldn't actually be bothered to read the rest. "At the upper limit of the sampler's range, sampling an analog wave roughly 2 times per cycle will result in a sloppy, hit-and-miss digital result which...