Search results

That statement is completely nonsensical, as accuracy necessarily refers to, as you note, sound in and sound out, and there are no bits involved until after the conversion to digital. No, the word we are looking for is "accurate". 3 to 6 rather... Not that it could be in any way significant...

And how is Sancho Panza? I trust he is well?

Ah, fighting windmills, again, eh, don? I should have known. Tape? Since when is this a tape discussion? Get with the program, dude! You guys (yes, you too) are bashing DIGITAL. Any kind of digital. All digital. Always. In any situation. That obviously includes digital reverbs.

What a surprise. and of course, none of these studios have digital recorders or digital reverbs at hand? Hmm?

Ok, so you obviously did not understand the graph. If you want you are welcome to expand on what in the graph you don't understand, so I can make it clearer, since I assume it is a lack of explanation from my side that is lacking. (My emphasis on system). 1. I did not say that. The statement is...

Correct. And therefore, we need to separate theroy and practice when this is discussed. If you say "In theory, this is impossible, because X" and I show X to be false, you can not come with the answer "well practically..." That's a bogus answer in that situation. See. You persist. I have never...

Frequency response is one source of "color".

"Coloring" are subtle changes in sound that are hard to say exactly what is going on. You can listen to two mic preamps, and find one "harsh" the other "soft" another "bright" some "warm" and others "cold". The main sources of color comes from distortions and frequency response. You typically...

The 1010, but not the 1010LT and from what I understand neither the 44 or 66, has its converters in the breakout box. This gives the 1010 slightly better S/N ratio. I have the 1010LT, and the noise is darn close to nothing anyway, so it's no biggie, though.

Of course not. Just as the phase relationship of two signals run through an analog mixer is never perfect. The original claim was that it was impossible for digital to record phase relationships signal delays which were lower than the space between two samples. I explained above why this...

http://theband.hiof.no/albums/session_discography.html http://theband.hiof.no/articles/m01_tntdodd.html "Despite the title, Music From Big Pink wasn't recorded in the basement there; it came from 4- and 8-track sessions at A&R Studios in Manhattan, and Capitol and Gold Star Studios in...

That's my understanding too. What you can say is that because if the inherent huge limitations in analog, especially in tape, but also in creating mixers (remember the stupid summing hype a year or so ago) most constructors has focus on making every piece of equipment sound good, because you'd...

Then digital tape would sound like analog tape, so no. ;) But you are partly correct. Analog tape sounds like analog tape largely because of the medium. The non-linearities of tape is a significant part of it's sound, including the famous tape compression. Magnetic tape is not an easy format...

Good explanations. In analog the signal i stored in a way that is an analougue to the acoustic wave. In digital it's stored as numbers. What people do is look at the numbers as if it was an analogue and say "hey, that looks nothing like the original wave, it's jagged and crooked and the...

This calls for visual aides. :) Se attached file. The two waves, red and blue, has a phase relationship that is WELL below the sample-rate. But as you see, because of their difference in phase, they get sampled at slightly different points in the wave, and the samples values therefore are...

The only head he has been hitting is his own. Yes, I agree that it would be nice to have an intelligent conversation and not a pissing match, but then ZEE, who has been doing most of the pissing has to stop it. Maybe this ia true in your dreams, but in this thread it is not. Nobody has claimed...

Complete and utter bullshit, as usual. Now, I can take a lot, but now I can not take any more of your utter bullshit. This was the drop thade made it run over. If you wanted to know, and if you wanted to learn, all you had to do was ask. I have shared loads of knowledge in this thread, and...

Ah. You still don't want to learn. That's what I thought. Well, welcome back when you do.

Well, you could use two RCA-cables into a 2-mono to stereo-adapter. However, it seems infinitely easier to buy a headphone amp. Or maybe even one of those smallest Behringer mixers. They cost around $50 and work fine as a headphone amplifier and you get two extra preamps for free. :)

There will be no bones. But there can be explanations. But at 12:17 GMT today, you were clearly not interested in those. Half an hour later you said you were. I just want confirmation that you really are interested, or it would be a waste of time. So, to start with your last question: "digital...