Search results

You forgot to insert your dick in the loop. That solves the problem.

OK, this is getting silly. *REBOOT* "Solo" is italian and means "alone". The SOLO button will mute all tracks, except the ones you pressed the SOLO button on.

Unless you plugged in something else than midi ports into the midi ports of the 1010, then no. Try to talk to M-audios support...

t.c. electronic has a reverb called M300. Lexicon has one called MX200. Both are around $300 if I remember correctly. The M300 sounds great, I haven't heard the Lexicon, but it should be fine too. Listen to both and choose. And if you can't listen go for the M300. I've never met one that isn't...

This is very true. My experive also tells me that you should start with reasonably cheap equipment, and only upgrade when it is the equipment, and not you, that is a hinderance for getting the sound you want.

http://www.lexiconpro.com/960L/index.asp List Price: $21,699.95 A hint for next time: Include a rough price range. ;)

Most has demos you can download and test. Try out at least Mackie Tracktion, Ableton Live, N-track, Cubase, Protools free and, if you have infinite amounts of time, the twenty million different variations of Cakewalk.

Yes, and as soon as you arm a track, you are no longer using the playback head. Becuase if you were, you could not record in sync. ;)

Ah, of course, they would want to use the same boxes, for cheapness and consistency in manufacturing... Anyway, stacking the knobs should work, unless they want significantly more knobs than the Speck. ;)

Yeah, if they start making a $1500 EQ they will break out of their current dead cheap price/drop-dead sound niche. And other companies EQs are not much more expensive that their preamps, so... ;) If they have dropped the RNEQ, it's most likely because they couldn't make it good enough in that...

Well, it's small and ugly... Maybe they think it ate up their market segment. ;) No honestly, it's also mono and expensive. I'd expect FMRAudio to make a stereo box for half that price, or less. That's where their segment has been so far.

Right, but most of the muffling on the behringer is mic position, you need to switch back and forth between the 123 parts of the pres. The difference is much smaller.

I think a guitar or singing would be more useful... and notice how much the mic position interferes. with the behringer mic pre you first think "oh my god it sounds like crap" but it turns out you don't speak directly into the mic in the beginning. :)

Of course! http://www.zzounds.com/a--2676837/item--YAMMG102 Yeah, that's probably a good choice if you can't find the $300 for two DMP3s.

Well, the EuroRack UB1202 is probably the only thing that fits your budget... :p

1. It's not a limiter, it's a leveling amplifier. 2. It's not based on a optical compression circuit, but it sounds like one. So, it's a compressor that is intended to introduce colour, where the RNC is designed to be transparent. I'd venture a guess that they actuallu use virtually the same...

OK, cool, I was wondering if I maybe should buy an MX200 as well, but it dropped several steps on my wish-list now. :) Still want a PCM80 though. ;)

OK, since nobody else does, and I like explaining... :p If you have a tape recorder with a separate record and playback head (as most two-track reel to reels have) you can play back what you recorded with a small delay. The delay is the time it takes the tape to move from the recording head...

What do you think about the sound itself (ignoring the parameter settings) when comparing the MPX500 and M300? The MPX500 and the MX200 should sound quite similar.

You got one too? They're NAAAJS! The tape delay is so good I hardly use my real one anymore. To much work patching it into the patch panel ;) That said, the new Lexicon MX200 looks really nice too, and costs the same. It solves the biggest problem with the earlier low-end Lexicons: The lack of...