Search results

As a species we have reached 2 new hieghts,Mikeing the fart and the Jerry Springer Show.

I would think sitting on a hard wood table with enough surface space for a Realistic PZM could prove to be a winner.... About the close miking of the 57,Makes you think about that mic you just bought on Ebay

If you already have a mixer and want more than 4 tracks,staying in the cassette format,the 238 is an economical way to go and still get wonderful results. It has rca inputs and out puts so it's real easy to hook up to any mixer. I only use mine for when I bring it out to record certain...

I want an NT3 as soon as I can afford one for my live gigs. I love my NT1. I just read a review in an Electronic Musician fron 97 or 98 when they came out,499.00 retail then.They said it stacked up to mics they used costing 2 to 3 times the price. What a great mic for the home recordist.

I see them sell for around 200.00 to 250.00 on Ebay. Hope this helps

Thanks for shedding some light on this, Your Mackies sound top shelf for home recording and beyond, One day I'm sure I will own one.

A few people I that I have giged with own and love their mackies,I am not clear on the direct out aspect. If You have their 12 channel version,does each channel have it's own dedicated output that you can have total control over,Level eq?

I have a Peavey Unity 300 Reference Quality 12 channel mixer. I'm satisfied with it. It is a nice little mixer with phantom power for my NT1. I think it was 200.00 new,on sale a few years back. I'm sure it's no Mackie but I like it.

Radio shack's ace in the hole is their location in relation to you. I'm surprised they make money,if they do.I have always gone there exclusely for nickel and dime stuff

Tascam 234. ReProduces the best. Not a cheap portastudio. Grossly Overlooked,Was a 1600.00 unit when it came out

Do Not usr Radio Shacks 1/4 inch tape. It's filthy.

Thanks TMX Bob, I didn't know there's a difference between "input" and "record" levels. I will make sure that my rear input gain is at least 1/2 turned when I use it,adjusting from there. I love this deck,Great for live recording. Saw your web posting on the scam dealer,Send it to there web...

Can someone please tell me if theres a difference or maybe a specific reason why the 234 has input gain controls on the front panel as well as by the rear section by the 1/4 inch rear mic/line input, I didn't get a manual with mine. Thanks in advance, Rob

My guess is it's pretty far to pick it up and check it out,But if it's under 300 miles that would be worth the trip considering the possible downside

Prism, Nice web site,Great pictures,Very inventive pop filter remedy! prism

if you want the performance of the 688 and if you own a mixer,check out the 238.It will cost less and will give you the Same outstanding performance. If you don't have a mixer and you need the total package,the 688 is the best all in one cassette based studio.a classic

I bought a 234 on ebay,The best audio quality in a cassette 4 track deck.It is so overlooked by cassette based home recordists. I have even seen new leftover models sell for 200.00. When you consider it sold for 1600.00 not that many years ago it is well worth checking out

Never owned a 488, The 488 MKII has phantom power,2 xlr mic ins and 3 band sweepable eq. The original does'nt. Pay the extra if you want a anolog cassette studio

Sounds to me that this is a case of how do we sell a great 4 track at a lower price level to more people.The fact that yours Doc is quieter than your 424 tells me outside of a few options,3 speed being one,That this is a quality porta and a much overlooked umit that is currently selling less...

That deck sold for over 500.00 in musicians friend in the fall of 1996.I would guess that's it's a nice portable 4 track.Tascam makes great gear,How much did you pay for it?