Search results

yeah i know the drums suck. they were kind of rushed so i didnt have time to listen to them and see certain problems (that really stupid fill during the guitar break, for instance... if you notice the drums go down right at that point, you're entirely correct. they come back up though.) i know...

yes its a wierd title. it actually makes sense in a strange way though. it certainly wont sound anything like what you might expect from that title. anyhow, this is the second thing i've put up here, so go easy. =P i know there are a couple mistakes, esp with the drums and the piano at the end...

course... the link doesnt work anymore.. but my point still stands.

you could just run a search... im sure most of the people you're interested in have posted something in the mp3 clinic. here's one by blue bear. http://www.homerecording.com/bbs/showthread.php?s=&threadid=40920

yes. it's exactly like that.

i'm far too lazy to dig up the big mm thread. here's the link: http://recpit.prosoundweb.com/viewtopic.php?t=3581

you're missing the point...

presumably it'd be able to do the converse, no?

"I only want one track of me, no doubling/chorusing/panning/etc." why not? I was recording a band who were great musically, but when it came to singing there was much left to be desired. the two guitarists took shots at doing the vocals but every take was laughable... seriously. i took the best...

why not, instead of two beta 52s, have one beta52 and one akg d112, or better yet d12, just for the added variety.

thank you everyone for the positive replies. lt.bob: the tune was written by the band, but i played some of the bass, since they dont have a bassist. the vocals are five tracks of the two guitarists singing into an mxl603 in my bathroom. nothing sounded good alone, but just to see what it...

P.S. since i'm totally inept in this respect, i didn't apply any EQ. i expect there will be a fair amount of criticism concerning that... in fact i'm depending on it to improve the mix.

hey guys. this is my friend's band recording in my basement on the gear i bought this summer. there are a couple blatant mistakes like rough transitions from part to part, the wierd change in terms of the guitar sound from the first part to the fast part, etc, but hey! it's my first...

excellent, thank you.

hey.. can anyone tell me whether or not .txt documents ala notepad from windows can be read on macs?

it was specifically said that there is to be no drooling!

do we really have to go through this again? there's a thread that asks just about the exact same question like three below this one at the time of this reply... here, i'll even link you: http://www.homerecording.com/bbs/showthread.php?s=&threadid=66360 and no one will give you a straight...

please... the pros (some of whom hang around here and other message boards. have you read mixerman?) dont even like what the pros do; the record companies force it on them.

i would imagine lots of (big) bands from elsewhere record in that hawaii studio... that's just a guess though.

can i please have your motorcycle?