Search results

Thank you! I'll take a shot at it tommrow I'm cooped up at work!

I'm not using the patchbay until after the dbx is setup correctly. Basically the direct outs of the Mackie are the buss outs in the diagram and the inputs on the manual would be the inputs to the Mackie correct?

this is a rats nest trying to get these units figured into the otari which is in a patchbay but ill figure it out. say i just remove the patchbay and do this Otari and mackie CR1604 and DBX units. how do i translate this image?

Ok I'll give this a look. Hopefully this DBX quiets it up enough. Proper hiss reduction and this machine would be killer

Should I just use the 10k and 1k internal Oscillator my Otari has to do the level Matching?

150, unbalanced model for my unbalanced I/O on this Otari

Hello! My otari has been killing it under regular recording circumstances (one collapsed bounce to channel 4 and 3 more channels for a total of 7 tracks). It's a truly pro level unit and I wanna shift the majority of my recording to it. Unfortunately it's only 4 channel's and 1/4 mds-36 tape I...

If you are tracking one channel at a time by yourself and have available channel inputs for your otari you could rig it up. I'm not exactly familiar with any other Mackie mixers but the 1604 and similar mixers from that era of Mackie

S Sweet eats would be your man on Tascam/Teac stuff. I simply offered a fool proof solution as it's what saved me. Ive used the 208 and 1604 recently and while the M-30 I have is confusing the 208 wasn't as bad. But mine was worn out I recently sold it.

It does but the M-208 is is a 4 buss console using an inline setup for tracking and overdubbing where as the split console approach is just more simple in terms of routing. Both work for what you're going for I just experienced and have seen many people get stumped by the architecture of older...

I This isn't a bad idea. I recorded with the m-30 once and I found it very pleasant. Love the EQ. Like the tascam M-208 EQ but not a noisey shitbox like the M-208

I could see that

The patchbays were to make switching multitrack decks and 15 different synthesizers easier on one mixer

Could I use the Mackie for effects sends it has with the m-30?

I just have had this near mint M-30 just sitting for so long I felt bad. If I could get it configured with those patchbays I'd be happy never touching the Mackie again

Imma have to give this a go. Realistically with the line mixer for effects this is a much better setup than a Mackie CR1604 right?

Is this it?

I'm sorry could you describe how this would be patched into the m-30 for sends? The mixer will be doing 8 and 4 in track work.

Would this tascam model 1 the M-30 manual mentions work?

Incredibly late reply but after considering selling this mixer for extra cash and saving up for a soundcraft 200 for my Otari i decided i will replace the mackie with it for a few weeks and see what happens and ill use this post very carefully. Id like to ask though as the manual is slightly...