
CFox
Banned
Ok, you werent addressing me, but I am quite happy to PWN you ( again ) on this one 
Slippery slope argument is a logical fallacy. There is no current technology to supercede raw athletic talent. Of course there is performance enhancement and masking and this does take place ( for the privileged few of course ).
More irrational ranting unrelated to technology and trends in entertainment.
Take yourself for example, the few days I have been here I have noticed you are quite informed on some topics - high end audio for example - and completely unable to differentiate on a lot of other matters.
He has to go through the recruitment and promotion process first and this is overseen by a governing body.
I dont think you understand human behaviour one little bit.
Get this through your head. Consumption drives technology and technology drives living standards. People who once could never get to a record store can now safely and conveniently peruse databases, finding both the music they have been recommended and making accidental happy discoveries. They only have to load a few seconds of a tune do determine if it engages them. For the rest of us ? Well it frees up more time.
Awww, you like your art spoon fed to you by "authorities" do you ? Also, like I said elsewhere, there was no "Cashola pay for play" back in the good ole days ? Lol.
One more time, no CASHOLA "back in the good ole days" ? How receptive were the top DJ's to avant garde sounds back then ?
Enough with the bad analogies already. Lol.
Who exactly are you complaining to ? Which authority ( you seem to love authority) ? The dying traditional music industry ? The industry who could sign and tie up acts ? Leaving albums sitting in the vaults never to be heard ?

OK, while we're at it, let's "democratize" the NBA. Fuck Mike Jordan, Kobe Bryant, Larry Bird, etc. Let's just let everybody in the NBA, no matter how much talent they may or may not have, because that's what's "fair".
Slippery slope argument is a logical fallacy. There is no current technology to supercede raw athletic talent. Of course there is performance enhancement and masking and this does take place ( for the privileged few of course ).
And while we're at it, let's democratize teaching; let's let any old idiot teach college physics or even high school math, whether they know how to add 2 and 2 together or not. (Never mind that in some school districts this isn't far from the truth now.) After all, it's only "fair" for everybody.
More irrational ranting unrelated to technology and trends in entertainment.
If there's one thing the Internet has shown us, people don't think they need to know a single thing about what they're talking about in order to try and tell others how it is.
Take yourself for example, the few days I have been here I have noticed you are quite informed on some topics - high end audio for example - and completely unable to differentiate on a lot of other matters.
And that drunken bastard over there? Hey there's a position open for police leiutenant, let's just give it to him because it only seems "fair".
He has to go through the recruitment and promotion process first and this is overseen by a governing body.
There are a couple of problems with the "simply let the public decide" argument. First is that the vast majority of the public does not WANT to decide, they just want their stuff handed to them without effort - especially when it comes to things like musical entertainment.
I dont think you understand human behaviour one little bit.
The Internet has not opened up any more quality niche musical acts than have been available for the past half-century. All it's done is affect the distribution of small label stuff which was always there. It's just that now one does not have to travel to their local quality record shop (which no longer exists) and look through the stax of wax for the good stuff. That has been replaced by Internet searches where one does not have to leave their desk to do it is all. Things haven't become better in quality, just easier for the lazy. Except now there's even more crap to sort through before finding find the good stuff.
Get this through your head. Consumption drives technology and technology drives living standards. People who once could never get to a record store can now safely and conveniently peruse databases, finding both the music they have been recommended and making accidental happy discoveries. They only have to load a few seconds of a tune do determine if it engages them. For the rest of us ? Well it frees up more time.
Second, now that Clear Channel has all but monopolized what we hear on the broadcast radio and Sirius/XM has strightjacketed tastes into narrow silos of preference on satellite, the general public has been given extremely limited choices as to what they get to easily choose from. It's not exactly "choice" as nature intended it. We're forced to look manually on the Internet for the good stuff.
Awww, you like your art spoon fed to you by "authorities" do you ? Also, like I said elsewhere, there was no "Cashola pay for play" back in the good ole days ? Lol.
There is an advantage to age. The younger ones just have no idea what radio used to be like, when DJs were allowed to be DJs, and the really good ones didn't just play the same 200 songs over and over again based upon a computer's decisison of what will sell the most commercials. And when what they played usually reflected a Kobe Bryant or Michael Jordan or New Orleans Saints behind the mic, and not just another nobody who simply knew how to use autotune and an editor to make it sound like they actually had talent.
One more time, no CASHOLA "back in the good ole days" ? How receptive were the top DJ's to avant garde sounds back then ?
Listening to manufactured talent is like trying to get entertainment out of a basketball game where everybody is wearing magic shoes that allow even Fat Albert to have a vertical jump of 6 feet and computerized gloves that lets a blind man make a 3-point basket every time.
Enough with the bad analogies already. Lol.
There are more people alive on this planet at this moment than have been alive, dead and buried by every other generation that ever existed COMBINED. That means that there's a greater pool of talent to chose from than ever before. Why settle for publishing those with no talent? It makes as little sense as the fact that with today's digital technology we have more dynamic range to play with than ever before, yet everybody wants to cram their music into the last 5 dB. Not all new ideas are necessarily better ideas.
G.
Who exactly are you complaining to ? Which authority ( you seem to love authority) ? The dying traditional music industry ? The industry who could sign and tie up acts ? Leaving albums sitting in the vaults never to be heard ?