I
iownrocknroll
New member
I would pay 4 grand for my 73's les paul deluxe....likewise my frankstein tele only cost me 300 stock.
I agree with some of what you are saying but some of it I dont,I would gladly pay $2000 for another Gibson if I could find one of these "professional" instruments with the inlays centred on the neck,without a tub of two pack filler around each one,the nut not cut too deeply on g, b and e strings,the heel not looking like it was crafted with a chainsaw and the finish not looking like the guy who sprayed it had a coughing fit while eating dry crackers.No, it is not a work of art. It is a tool. A paint brush. The art only happens when someone uses it to make music. Luthiers, myself included, are NOT artists. We are craftsman. All I am doing is making a very fancy sonic paint brush.
As to the rest, you are right that a Gibson is not a violin. But it also does not cost as much as a great violin. $2000 for a profesional instrument is not ridiculous. THAT is my point.
Light
"Cowards can never be moral."
M.K. Gandhi
And yes, saying things like this is EXACTLY why I chose to stay anonymous on this forum.
(No, really I am. I don't mean a word of what I just said.)And I have owned PRS in the past..
But I would have to say the guitar I most like to play cost me
< $700... It's my Schecter C1 Elite.. It is every bit a PRS without the fat price tag...

Not sure why Epiphone are getting a slating, I had a gold top that was lovely, good tone, good finish, good price.
Obviously not your ultimate guitar material, but not as bad as some people make out.
....Gibson OTOHI don't know everything...

Gibsons are overpriced but worth every dime...
