Best sounding album you have ever heard?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mystasynasta
  • Start date Start date
Pink Floyd's Dark Side of the Moon... and of course I'm listening to it on a CD in its fully remastered version, but I still can't believe it was recorded in the 70s!!!

Also,
Godspeed You Black Emperor's "Lift Your Skinny Fists Like Antennas to Heaven"
Mars Volta's "De-Loused in the Comatorium"

and I've gotta put a plug in for "Pet Sounds" being the best mono I've ever heard.
 
wow im glad i started this forum. im going to pick up a few new cds as reference material
 
SouthSIDE Glen said:
Lord knows I need one! :o

Honestly, though, ez, aren't you suprised that it took 95 posts before "Aja" showed up?
Yeah, kind of surprised, but really, it's one of those "who's the best rock band ever" kind of questions. What I consider the best is more than likely not what anyone else would consider to be best. But you know that so why am I still typing? :o :p
 
dude tool is not the best sounding album...i love there stuff, but i really don't think they sound that good...
i like pinback and radiohead kid a
 
lo beam said:
Finn - The Finn Brothers.

Tchad Blake is the greatest living engineer/producer. Hands down.


you're in luck, he's doing Q&A @ gearslutz this month
 
Another vote for Dark Side of the Moon.

I also rate Blonde on Blonde
 
im not sure how many people listen to Choking Victim on here (they were an NY Ska/Punk band), but the clean ska guitar, distored guitar, drums, bass, and vocals on 'No Gods/No Managers' are all spot on and sound incrdeible and despite being a well-recorded album still retained that raw punk sound
 
Quadrophenia by the Who.

Animals or Darkside of the Moon by Pink Floyd

Pet Sounds by The Beachboys. There would be no Sgt. Pepper without this album
 
Blood Sugar Sex Magick, by Red Hot Chili Peppers

Produced by Rick Rubin
 
No Soundgarden Superunkown? Listen to those drums. Some of THE best rock drums captured on tape.

OK Computer is probably my all time favorite for sound, though its definitely not the clearest. I think most of that sound comes from the Jane Seymour's frickin mansion they recorded in. I think most if not all of that reverb was natural.
 
Interesting that most stuff listed here is old stuff. Very interesting indeed...

Since this is Homerecording.com, I'm gonna list some of my fave (best sounding) stuff that's done... you guessed it... at home studio on PCs... Oddly enough, they also belong to the 21st century :p

Exile: Pro Agonist
Amon Tobin: Supermodified
Pendulum: Hold Your Colour album and The Vault tune.
 
noisewreck said:
Interesting that most stuff listed here is old stuff. Very interesting indeed...

well this poll is gonna be like that since most people here are musicians (it is home recording) and most musicians only listen to old stuff, come on who can tell me one thing thats in the charts right now! we listen to old stuff because it rocks! there were good musicians in those bands. now the stuff thats been voted as best sounding has generally been judged by the instrumentation as opposed to the sound or just peoples favorite band hence its mainly old stuff

really can you say the beatles had good sound or would you say they were great. if they had decent desks back then they would have used it

just listen to early floyd and late floyd. its still predominatly floyd but the sound quality sucks on early albums.

thats just my opinion though mabe you guys like their sound? if so ask yourself: why am i recording on a DAW? :confused:
 
hate to say

I hate to say it, but this thread sucks. Its basically just a bunch of dudes listing their favorite bands. Anyone could say anything. Theres nothing to be learned and no real information changing hands. I read through and most of the stuff people listen sounds great for what type of music it is but the same production on a different project would have sucked ass. Plus, everybody has their own idea of what good production is so i dont really see the point of just listing album names. I think it would be better if people said what it was production wise they enjoyed about a particular album and how they achieved the sound rather than just listing the cds they currently have in their player or whatever. Just listing good albums is lame. Especially when most of these albums are just typical production in decent facilities to begin with. Dont get me wrong if it sounds good it sounds good, and im not about to try to point out idiotic tastes because its a losing battle. But just listing some lame punk band album that doesnt sound any different than any of the other punk albums is just a waste of time.

For me personally i judge production on all levels. I think its more important to look at creativity more than fidelity. Also, things that stand out from other production jobs that occured around the time an album came out impress me. Its really hard to convince people of things because everyone just wants to break out their favorite heros albums and shove em in your face.

Speaking of which i think Joe Meek was the most creative record producer of all time. You can say what you want about his personal life or the type of music he worked on, but his efforts were amazing and so was his dedication. A few years ago i had never even heard of Joe Meek, but since then i have dug deep into his recordings and i have realized the unsung genius he was and the effect he had on the way records are made. And some might say that his techniques would have been discovered sooner or later, but for Joe, even in the face of his insulting competitors, it WAS sooner. And then later copied by all of them. Music may be "heavier" these days and louder and bassier, but none have the pure sonic abandon that Joes recordings had when compared to the other recordings of his time. The spirit of punk in the form of production is ever present in Joes recordings. I dont expect everyone to appreciate Joe Meeks production intentions because many wont be able to hear past the dated music and dated fidelity, but those who have a sharp ear will hear the genius of what he did differently and how he made records how HE wanted to and fuuck everyone elses methods and tastes.
 
joe

I just think its nuts how he got that kick sound. Ive never heard another recording that has a kick like that. They say it was a ribbon he used, some special kind that wouldnt break from air pushing past it, so maybe thats why. But his kick sound is such a signature, who else has a kick sound that can be instantly identified as their "own"?

Also the way he treats vocals to make even the lamest singers sound interesting is brilliant. He could make a housewife sound like a psychedelic robot or something without using phasers or flangers or any effects boxes like that (there werent really any then anyways) using almost subliminal manipulation of frequencies and doubling and reamping.

I love Joe Meeks sound and if the same principles were applied today records would sound insane. These days no matter how heavy and out there bands sound their recordings still sound controlled in some ways. Everything is made to be "soft" somehow. Its like instead of making the fuzz abrasive or peculiar sounding, they just double track it and add more fuzz and a 7th string and so on. But i think theyd go farther just making abrasive sound abrasive and so on and not try to make the monsters as vicious as possible yet "pocket sized" at the same time. Maybe that sounds crazy but im sure you understand what i mean.
 
Good Friend said:
I think it would be better if people said what it was production wise they enjoyed about a particular album and how they achieved the sound rather than just listing the cds they currently have in their player or whatever. Just listing good albums is lame. Especially when most of these albums are just typical production in decent facilities to begin with.

I'm still waiting for those "techniques" you so aptly said we should name.

I think thinking you're special makes you lame.

What is wrong with listing good records? I know its "lame", but what else?

And fishkarma, musicians only listen to old stuff? What the fuck does that mean. Are you willing to quantify that by putting a date on "old"?

We could probably make a whole thread about many of these records' production techniques by themselves. I could make 2 about OK Computer. Its not old, and is not "typical production" in a "decent" facility. Look at the Shins' new record. That album sounds great and was done in typical production with less than decent facility.
 
oh yeah. Diabolical Masquerade - Deaths Design... Check it out. It's really cool.
 
rory said:
What is wrong with listing good records? I know its "lame", but what else?

And fishkarma, musicians only listen to old stuff? What the fuck does that mean. Are you willing to quantify that by putting a date on "old"?

listing good records is fine as long as you believe that the mix is done well and everything sounds amazing but as far as listing say an early floyd recording which you think is a great track but the production sucked on due to the equipment and early mix techniques that dont sound good defeats the point in the thread

i should of worded my sentence better i should have said mainly listen to old recordings (like before the 80's rock n roll is a general time when most musicians would listen to as it is rarely hated by any musician. death metal might be their thing but listening to rock like Hendrix or the Jethro Tull wont offend any one) its a generalization but most people will listen to 60s and 70s rock. unles your a computer musician in which case you probably wont.
thats all i meant. to be honest i think your looking too deep into a general statement which just gives a reason why it MIGHT be mainly old stuff chosen
 
josh groban's Closer album is breathtakingly recorded and mixed. ,celtic woman also has great sound, especially their renditon of sailing.
 
Back
Top