Serendipity Records
Well-known member
Maybe because there's precedent of dismissing cases of classified documents being held illegally in former gov't officials' homes...
Trump on Trial!
- Thread starter Sky Blue Lou
- Start date
Serendipity Records
Well-known member
Melania literally "married" a twice-divorced man.
To add…..
Probably more like a clown show. On both sides.
We have two ‘questionable’ presidents. One former, one current. Both are batshit in their own ways.
Once presidents were respected, generals would salute them. When the president came on tv we’d listen. It was a big deal. The president was speaking to the nation.
Now it’s all idiocracy. We have crazies running things.
I have serious doubts as to the survival of our nation.
Probably more like a clown show. On both sides.
We have two ‘questionable’ presidents. One former, one current. Both are batshit in their own ways.
Once presidents were respected, generals would salute them. When the president came on tv we’d listen. It was a big deal. The president was speaking to the nation.
Now it’s all idiocracy. We have crazies running things.
I have serious doubts as to the survival of our nation.
Serendipity Records
Well-known member
What law exactly did Trump break in the Stormy Daniels case? I can't keep it quite straight?
Sky Blue Lou
Well-known member
It is alleged that they labelled "Hush Money" payments as legal expenses. Evidently that is a crime? If that isn't a legal expense I'm not sure what it is.
Dave Matthews
Dave's not here
It's not a "Stormy Daniels" case.
It is a case about falsifying documents, and illegal campaign influence.
So why would Stormy be testifying about the sexual encounter itself? Seems a bit irrelevant to the charges.
Dave Matthews
Dave's not here
Big mess. Too much insanity for me to want to follow. I just get snippets of info.
For the most part I’m happily blissfuly ignorant.
Edit: Regarding the above sentence, it relates to these court cases.
Last edited:
Serendipity Records
Well-known member
You mean he tried to hide it from Melania, and their marriage certificate was falsified through perjury of the wedding oath? Yup, makes sense.
Dave Matthews
Dave's not here
FFS no.
He was trying to keep the story out of the news during his Presidential bid/run in 2015/2016. Campaign influencing. Illegal.
Serendipity Records
Well-known member
How is keeping your personal life personal influencing a campaign??
leddy
Well-known member
I honestly wish the only charges against Trump were the conspiracy to defraud the US and the related charges around Jan 6. I don’t care much about the rest. Too many others have been guilty of the same and not been charged, but what he did leading up to Jan 6 needs to be laid bare and answered for.
Serendipity Records
Well-known member
I agree that those are by far the most pertinent charges. As for an outcome of those cases, I don't know, but I support having that cleared up.
Dave Matthews
Dave's not here
Because voters knowing would have changed some votes. He/they knew that, so Trump/Cohen/Weisselberg/Pecker all conspired to hide/bury it by buying the story and killing it.
If they never thought it would matter, they wouldn't have done that, now would they?
Dave Matthews
Dave's not here
I completely get that.
Also, were that the case (ha ha) we likely would be seeing them in play now instead of later...
leddy
Well-known member
The decision to indict him in the SDNY I think is to prevent him from being able to pardon himself. There’s where any DNC conspiracy lives if there is one. Feds should pursue him for the election conspiracy because that’s where the real crime is (allegedly, of course). If he gets convicted of that, yet still wins the White House and pardons himself, then yeah half this country really fucking pisses me off, but that’s democracy for ya.
Last edited:
As every other politician has attempted to do for a campaign. They all whitewash their past and attempt to bury unflattering info.