brassplyer
Well-known member
It's called politically-motivated lawfare - duh.It's called the law... Duh...
It's called politically-motivated lawfare - duh.It's called the law... Duh...
Bull fucking shit.It's called politically-motivated lawfare - duh.
Go ahead and give your opinion of the specifics of how he broke the law.Bull fucking shit.
He broke the law.
Will he be punished for it? We'll see. But fuck off with the idea that he didn't break the law.
What a kool aid induced echo chamber crock of crap.
Bull fucking shit.
He broke the law.
Will he be punished for it? We'll see. But fuck off with the idea that he didn't break the law.
What a kool aid induced echo chamber crock of crap.
It's not just a wall, it's also manpower and technology. You don't think it's possible to build a wall and patrol it such that efforts like tunnels and other measures to get past can be thwarted? Betcha it is.
What do you think the ultimate goal of those who give Biden orders is?ls are like
He is never going to jail. It is all smoke and mirrors while the corporations go about their business.Bull fucking shit.
He broke the law.
Will he be punished for it? We'll see. But fuck off with the idea that he didn't break the law.
What a kool aid induced echo chamber crock of crap.
He is never going to jail. It is all smoke and mirrors while the corporations go about their business.
And again it's not just a wall it's manpower, technology and substantially overhauling and tightening the *entire* immigration system - such as prioritizing keeping track of those with visas and much greater scrutiny on those visas being issued in the first place. The first World Trade Center bombers were in the US on expired and illegitimately obtained farm worker visas, none of them had set foot on a farm.Or perhaps sensible people understand that the majority of illegals are overstayed visas, and that a wall is not an economical way to deal with the problem.
Not gonna lie. As much as I'd love to see it I doubt it as well...He is never going to jail. It is all smoke and mirrors while the corporations go about their business.
If you did what he has done, you would be in jail.I don't know, man.
At times we often hear, "nobody is above the law." At other times we hear, "If he broke the law...should be prosecuted" At still other times we hear with absolute certainty, "Bull fucking shit. He broke the law." Seems there is often a disconnect depending who and what crimes have been committed, and the certainty of guilt. It's probably good to remind ourselves of the clear thinking in judgement that comes with impartiality, and the requirement in criminal court for guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The rest is opinion, which of course we are all entitled....even when we're wrong.
If you did what he has done, you would be in jail.
What is it exactly that he did that I would go to jail for if I did it?Truth bomb-->>If you did what Biden did, you'd be in jail. If you don't know that, you're lying to yourself.
What is it exactly that he did that I would go to jail for if I did it?
Nope, not getting away with that mate.The fact that you have to ask that question is facepalm.
I assume you are voting for Biden Nov 5th?It's called the law... Duh...
That is ridiculous mate.
You did a crime, in a state. You are charged in that state. You get a jury in that state. You get a trial in that state.
Who's fault is it that you did the crime?
What an absolute crock of shit.
Don't like it? Tough shit. Maybe don't do the fuckin' crime... maybe... just sayin'
Cry baby snowflake Trump can't handle the truth that it is all self inflicted.
Here in the US a defendant is innocent until proven guilty and the verdict has not been rendered yet.Bull fucking shit.
He broke the law.
Will he be punished for it? We'll see. But fuck off with the idea that he didn't break the law.
What a kool aid induced echo chamber crock of crap.
Nope, not getting away with that mate.
Tell us all what it is.
Exactly.
Well their investigation determined that there was no reason to prosecute, so there's that. Reason being they asked to search and retain, and there was zero deception or denial.Oh c'mon, Dave.
Okay, I'll agree to one, just one, if you agree to do P-house's yes or no thing. Agree?
If you were found to have several decades worth of classified documents haphazardly stored in your garage, fully accessible to your crackhead son I might add, would it not be an absolute certainty you would face incarceration? Yes or no?
Gag orders should not even exist in the first place, least of all in cases involving a Presidential candidate. Sounds like some sort of hush-up...I think he will go to jail for his continued breakage of the gag orders.
So threats are OK. Got it.Gag orders should not even exist in the first place, least of all in cases involving a Presidential candidate. Sounds like some sort of hush-up...
Well their investigation determined that there was no reason to prosecute, so there's that. Reason being they asked to search and retain, and there was zero deception or denial.
Me? Hmmm... I suspect that it would depend on my circumstances. If I'm still just a phone guy/business owner and I had classified documents then yeah, I think I'd be fucked.