In America it's asking too much to have an ID to vote.
"Is there any way to get a breakdown of the 2008 voter turnout, by race (white and black) and type of vote (early and Election Day)?" a staffer for the state's Republican-controlled legislature asked in January 2012.
"Is there no category for 'Hispanic' voter?" a GOP lawmaker asked in March 2013 after requesting a range of data, including how many voters cast ballots outside their precinct.
And in April 2013, a top aide to the Republican House speaker asked for "a breakdown, by race, of those registered voters in your database that do not have a driver's license number."
Months later, the North Carolina legislature passed a law that cut a week of early voting, eliminated out-of-precinct voting and required voters to show specific types of photo ID - restrictions that election board data demonstrated would disproportionately affect African Americans and other minorities.
Critics dubbed it the "monster" law - a sprawling measure that stitched together various voting restrictions being tested in other states. As civil rights groups have sued to block the North Carolina law and others like it around the country, several thousand pages of documents have been produced under court order, revealing the details of how Republicans crafted these measures.
A review of these documents shows that North Carolina GOP leaders launched a meticulous and coordinated effort to deter black voters, who overwhelmingly vote for Democrats. The law, created and passed entirely by white legislators, evoked the state's ugly history of blocking African-Americans from voting - practices that had taken a civil rights movement and extensive federal intervention to stop.
Last month, a three-judge federal appeals panel struck down the North Carolina law, calling it "the most restrictive voting law North Carolina has seen since the era of Jim Crow." Drawing from the emails and other evidence, the 83-page ruling charged that Republican lawmakers had targeted "African-Americans with almost surgical precision."
A 2013 report by North Carolina's Board of Elections showed that between 2000 and 2012, out of nearly 40 million votes cast, only two cases of in-person voter fraud were referred to a district attorney.
Over several email exchanges, state researchers told GOP legislators that between 318,643 and 612,955 registered voters appeared to lack IDs issued by the North Carolina Division of Motor Vehicles. And the data attached showed the percentage of black people at risk of losing their vote under the new law was much higher than whites.
In concept, your implication that we should have voter ID laws sounds reasonable.
Here's what actually is happening:
How Republicans in North Carolina created a 'monster' voter ID law - Chicago Tribune
If you cant get an ID you are like a two headed albino unicorn.
It's not that they can't. It's that they didn't. There are hundreds of thousands of them. There is absolutely no justification for this type of law. The only justification is in-person voter fraud, and in-person voter fraud is nearly nonexistent. Again, 2 cases in 13 years in a state with a population of 10 million people.
I'll say it again:
It makes absolutely no sense...unless you are a Republican trying to prevent black people from voting.
There are hundreds of thousands of them.
The most ridiculous shit I've heard.
Who in this society dosen't have a drivers license or at least a state ID?
How is this number derived? You can't live in today's society without an ID. If that "hundreds of thousands" spans several decades of time, I might accept, but how many currently do not have ID's and why not?
It makes no sense that you would just wake up on election day and say "geez. I forgot to get an ID". It's a responsibility issue, not a race issue.
The most ridiculous shit I've heard.
Who in this society dosen't have a drivers license or at least a state ID?
I'd posit that just because you don't know, and because you don't believe, and you think it's ridiculous, doesn't make it untrue. Is the North Carolina thing IBB is talking about, law or not? If yes, then what was its purpose, other than what IBB ascribes?
The US electoral system is corrupted because laws like this can exist, and voter registration, voting format and electoral division are in the hands of elected politicians, rather than an independent body.
People who can barely afford bus fares dont have driving licenses
People who can barely speak english may not have the documents for state ID
I dont have a birth cert, as it stands I couldnt get state ID
Oh how ridiculous that shit is
How would someone who can hardly afford bus fare not be able to get some form of ID.
If they are that poor they're probably tied in to some kind of welfare. Gotta be some kind of offial documentation for that.
If someone barely spoke English, wouldn't that imply that they recently enteref the country? If they did so legally there would be a paper trail.
How come you don't have a birth certificate? Does that mean you have no DL or ID either?
( that last question, you don't have to answer)
welfare cheques etc dont count as proof
People can live in communities where English isn't a requirement, its not the official language or forced in entry, they could be here for decades
A birth cert costs $25, a laughably small amount to a working person, the difference between baby formula or not to others
Birth certs are not required to get a driving license in either of the states ive lived..