Lopp
New member
FWIW, I thought I'd share my highly subjective results from an experiment performed the other night.
After hearing different stories of using SM57's etc. on certain vox, I thought I'd check how the following compared:
1. SM58
2. AKG C3000
3. Marshall v67
A female singer was recorded through a Mackie 1402 into a PC running Cubase 5.1 using a Delta 66. I would have also tried a SM57, but the singer was getting burnt out.
For the subjective analysis:
The SM58 sounded warmer and more midrangey, but lacked the brightness of the C3000 and the v67. Some of the warmth can be attributed to the singer singing closer to the mic and the effects of the windscreen.
Overall, the C3000 was the brightest and was my personal favorite possibly based on the increased presence. The v67 was a close 2nd and the SM58 was third due to the reduced presence. Each mic has its place depending on vocal and mix requirements.
Take that for what it's worth.
After hearing different stories of using SM57's etc. on certain vox, I thought I'd check how the following compared:
1. SM58
2. AKG C3000
3. Marshall v67
A female singer was recorded through a Mackie 1402 into a PC running Cubase 5.1 using a Delta 66. I would have also tried a SM57, but the singer was getting burnt out.
For the subjective analysis:
The SM58 sounded warmer and more midrangey, but lacked the brightness of the C3000 and the v67. Some of the warmth can be attributed to the singer singing closer to the mic and the effects of the windscreen.
Overall, the C3000 was the brightest and was my personal favorite possibly based on the increased presence. The v67 was a close 2nd and the SM58 was third due to the reduced presence. Each mic has its place depending on vocal and mix requirements.
Take that for what it's worth.