Paul was never dead,
but unfortunately, John is.
I must still be in denial, because I can hardly believe it's been 20 years! All our lives have changed so much in the past 20 years, but John's gone, and his legacy was frozen in time, a long, long time ago.
He was a victim of the insane.
There's nothing that any of us could do, to prevent that, turn it around, or bring John back. The world lost a great artist, no doubt. He was one of a kind. Even Julian, with all John's best genes, still can't be John, or do what John did.
Also, the surviving Beatles, I've enjoyed almost everything they've put out. There's a lot of great music, there, with the Post-Beatle-Beatles.
And the 1995 'Free as a Bird' sessions, etc, [Anthology+], that was the "reunion" of the Beatles. That was a pseudo-reunion, and they did well with what they had to work with, but it was not the "Beatles".
FI, when John cut the demo, it was ~mid 70's, and John didn't want Paul to play on his tunes, at that time. George and Ringo played with John, on & on, after the Beatles broke up.
Anyway, the surviving Beatles did well with the tapes they had to work with, but that was a '70's John, and a '90's George, Paul & Ringo. They're playing had evolved, quite a bit, but it was a '70's John. The result was decent, pleasant, and still a good song, but it was a '90's song, and if John were alive, it would have sounded much different. John was murdered, killed in cold blood, and snuffed out, just like that. He wasn't given the chance to evolve.
Likewise, I think the "Free as a Bird" sessions would have sounded a lot different, if it was a 'contemporary' ['70's] Beatles piece, with a '70's George, a '70's Paul, and a '70's Ringo.
-------------
Lots of people miss John Lennon. He was loved, worldwide, almost universally. Some people didn't like him, he wasn't universally liked. Nixon didn't like him. Chapman didn't like him.
John's gone, and the whole world misses him. He cast a great shadow, over the world. There's really noone in the modern world who can fill his shoes. Who's gonna do it? Bono? Sting? Springsteen? Dylan? Mick Jagger? Paul McCartney?
Forget it, there's no replacing him.
Meanwhile, his great voice has been silenced forever, and we're just 20 years older. [Yoko's still cool, though].
People keep John's spirit alive, by remembering him, talking about him, sharing his ideas and music. Share his music. Play it. Live it.
... in fact, he's playing "Peggy Sue" on the CD changer, right now, [600 disc/random play/no delay].
Now, it's time for James Brown, and time to sign off.
Heh, ya, I got-ta have-a,
Yeah, I got-ta need-a,
Oh yes, I got-ta do-a,
Make it Funky,
Good God!
Make it Funky,
Take me home,
Make it Funky,
To the Bridge!
---------
What a coincidence, after James Brown, it's Paul McCartney.
Then Bowie, but that's another post.
---------
I like Sgt. Pepper, just fine, but I probably like Revolver a little better. I also like Rubber Soul, and especially Magical Mystery Tour.
Ah Hell. I like all the Beatles albums. They're all different. They all have something to offer.
Hey, we can talk about the Beatles, as if they're dated, and they literally are. Modern music, and post-Beatle era music is very, very different than most Beatle music, but in the context of their time, their music was state of the art, in Rock & Roll.
They didn't come out of nowhere, you know, they had their influences, but they definitely popped on the world scene, right out of nowhere, and set the standard.
Beatles music is a large part of the foundation of other, post-Beatle era Rock music.
You [or I] can say it's dated, and it is, in the literal sense, but bottom line is, that Beatles music is timeless.
The Beatles music defined the times they were in, not the other way around.
-------------
I'll get off my friggin' soap box, now.