hi guys
this is similar to lascalaboys' question earlier this week, but i thought it was just different enough to warrant another thread - sorry if not!
i've just been mixing some stuff i didn't record, and had a load of group choir components (mono track of group sopranos, mono of group altos etc) - not ideal but there you go, and i wanted to do something to make them sound a bit bigger in the absence of stereo.
so i tried all the suggestions about +/- 10 cent pitched panning, doubling reverbs etc, but i then remembered something an 'old hand' producer friend of mine said to me, that sometimes it pays not to pan HARD left and right, but that sometimes things sound naturally wider if you pan them 60-70% L &R instead.
i thought it was worth a go and sure enough, the choir tracks sounded much wider compared to hard left and right.
am i trying to hear things here, or can anyone explain what's going on - it intrigued me!
thanks for your time
paul d
tollboothmusic
this is similar to lascalaboys' question earlier this week, but i thought it was just different enough to warrant another thread - sorry if not!
i've just been mixing some stuff i didn't record, and had a load of group choir components (mono track of group sopranos, mono of group altos etc) - not ideal but there you go, and i wanted to do something to make them sound a bit bigger in the absence of stereo.
so i tried all the suggestions about +/- 10 cent pitched panning, doubling reverbs etc, but i then remembered something an 'old hand' producer friend of mine said to me, that sometimes it pays not to pan HARD left and right, but that sometimes things sound naturally wider if you pan them 60-70% L &R instead.
i thought it was worth a go and sure enough, the choir tracks sounded much wider compared to hard left and right.
am i trying to hear things here, or can anyone explain what's going on - it intrigued me!
thanks for your time
paul d
tollboothmusic