crazydoc
Master Baiter
This may have been discussed, but I haven't seen it.
Several of my cheaper guitars have a fret placed directly after the nut, over which the strings pass after emerging from the nut grooves. This fret acts to define the neck end of the string length, instead of the nut doing this as is usual. I can see that the advantage of this is that the bottoms of all the strings are at the same level (or on the same radius if the fretboard is curved), obviating any necessity of nut groove depth filing/adjustment, as long as the depth is lower then that of the fret.
The disadvantage would be that no adjustment is possible, if you want different string heights above the fretboard.
Anyone know if this method of construction makes any difference in the tone or other qualities of the guitar?
Several of my cheaper guitars have a fret placed directly after the nut, over which the strings pass after emerging from the nut grooves. This fret acts to define the neck end of the string length, instead of the nut doing this as is usual. I can see that the advantage of this is that the bottoms of all the strings are at the same level (or on the same radius if the fretboard is curved), obviating any necessity of nut groove depth filing/adjustment, as long as the depth is lower then that of the fret.
The disadvantage would be that no adjustment is possible, if you want different string heights above the fretboard.
Anyone know if this method of construction makes any difference in the tone or other qualities of the guitar?