I'm sorry to have to say this, because i'm a long time ntrack user and love the intuitiveness and ease of use of the interface, but Ntrack has serious problems dealing with plugin latency. Since the arrival of latency plugins, ntrack has been plagued with latency mismatching issues. The current version of ntrack is not useable unless:
A: you don't use groups
B: you don't intend to put plugins on aux channels
Other issues with ntrack:
1. Doesn't work well with low latency buffering
2. Lots of small bugs
3. The program's underlying architecture is not resource efficient
4. Flavio can't seem to be able to keep up with the fast pace of DAW development. Other DAW applications have teams of developers while ntrack has one person.
Perhaps it is still possible for ntrack to revitalize. I think what would be needed is an intense focus on basic functionality rather than on new features.
I love the spirit which Flavio has put into developing this software, and hope that new revisions will address many of these problems, but at this point I advise anyone considering this software to look elsewhere.
A: you don't use groups
B: you don't intend to put plugins on aux channels
Other issues with ntrack:
1. Doesn't work well with low latency buffering
2. Lots of small bugs
3. The program's underlying architecture is not resource efficient
4. Flavio can't seem to be able to keep up with the fast pace of DAW development. Other DAW applications have teams of developers while ntrack has one person.
Perhaps it is still possible for ntrack to revitalize. I think what would be needed is an intense focus on basic functionality rather than on new features.
I love the spirit which Flavio has put into developing this software, and hope that new revisions will address many of these problems, but at this point I advise anyone considering this software to look elsewhere.