NS 10's. Let's see who actually used them.

[Sound Cracker]

Were NS 10's really "all that"? Anyone who has worked with them would say about the same thing. Tiring! Midrange heavy! No low end!

Nothing compared to a decent pair of Genelec's!

Cast YOUR vote.

Good Day!

 

[Sound Cracker]

Only 4 votes?

Good Day!

 

[ametth]

I voted for that bob guy..what a bastard..

 

[Blue Bear Sound]

Clearwater??

Don't you mean - Bob Clearmountain??

 

[Sound Cracker]

Oops!

The things you never double check. I am not even sure why Clearwater came to mind, except I was checking into a rafting tour for this summer and one was called Clearwater, but you are of course right Bruce. Thank you for the correction!

Good Day!

 

[John Sayers]

Com'on cracker - they were the best around at the time - I used them for years, then I figured that 20/20's were better.

Now I think Genelecs are even better

hey - things are getting better

cheers
john

 

[CMiller]

I used NS-10's during the early 90's in a friend's studio, but haven't heard a pair in a long time. So my memory of what they sound like is kind of distant. But what I do remember is that they weren't "full" sounding in any regard. But I think everyone already knew that.

 

[mixmkr]

big Auratones....as a second monitor...sure, ok.....

besides, who ever saw them in a Nashville studio as the ONLY monitor anyway??....not me..

 

[JuSumPilgrim]

At least they were CLEAR in the mids unlike alot of the nearfields out now which are bass heavy and cardboardy in the mids. But I guess playing "guess whats going on below 440Hz" stopped being a fun way to spend your sundays.