Vaccines have been mandated for little children in the USA for over 150 years now.
Vaccine mandates have prevented millions of deaths and life-ruining illnesses.
The COVID vaccines saved an estimated 140,000 American lives in the first five Months alone:
COVID-19 vaccination efforts are making a big difference, with thousands of lives saved.
www.psychiatrictimes.com
I read the article, thanks for posting. Did you read the entire article? That number is
problematic, as it doesn't include what one might characterize as control group(s). Of the vaccines mandated for little children, I would posit the development utilized control groups, for multiple purposes. I would guess the development of all of those vaccines utilized control groups. I'm not going to look it up, you may if you wish, and post your findings.
But let's assume that 140,000 lives saved as fact, for the sake of argument....which i'm not arguing, merely discussing. From what I understand, until very recently, or perhaps not quite yet, the vaccine hasn't been approved for children. I think the last I heard the government was giving it a move forward with vaccinating children even though it had yet to be approved by
the science. But if it had been, how many lives in addition to the 140,000 would have been saved? Children, I mean. Covid 19 poses a very, very low risk to children. I can't recall where, or the exact details, but i've read papers that summarize risks. It said something like, totally paraphrasing, a healthy fully vaccinated 70 year old is at far, far greater risk of serious illness or death from covid than a 7 year old child. Risk to a 7 year old is negligible. Couple that with increased risk of inflammation of the heart, it's nuts to suggest full vaccination of children, even young adults.
Did you read the link I posted? I find it curious i've heard nobody anywhere referencing the paper. I stumbled across it. Unless I am reading/interpreting it wrong, it clearly comes to the finding that populations with high vaccination rates are experiencing higher covid rates. Higher meaning higher than in what one might call a control group, populations with low vaccination rates. A very curious thing, don't you think? If it were not for the control group(s), in the example given Vietnam and S. Africa, we wouldn't know that. Every population would have a high vax rate and experience similar covid rates. Controls groups are good, useful. It almost seems when it comes to covid the powers that be don't want a control group. Everybody's got to get the vaccine. Years down the road when populations start to experience an uptick in heart problems, the government can blame it on poor diet and slap one of them mandates on dietary restrictions.
Anyway, seriously curious, what do you think about that paper?