Basslord1124
New member
Ok, I do want to point out that I am no way against upgrading (you'll find out in minute) but do have certain feelings towards it.
Ok, the problem I'm currently having (since I've already picked a mobo which is the Asus A7A266) is what processor to get. I have came to the conclusion though that I'll get an Athlon but now it's a matter of what kind (T-Bird, XP...) My mobo supports speeds up to 1.2Ghz or so it seems that is what I've read. I posted a message on another message board (harmony-central) and someone there suggested for me to get at least an XP 1700+. I looked at that processor to see the speed and it was like a 1.4. I have emailed asus to see if that mobo can support bigger processors than a 1.2...I'm still awaiting a response though. But as I've said it once and I'll say it again, I probably will not be doing 50+ tracks or anything (of anything it's at most like 20 tracks). So my original decision was to stick with a 1.2...I felt that'd be just fine, especially since I know some people here *cough* Gidge *cough* get by with much much less than a 1.2 and have good results. I know sometimes it's good to buy a little extra (especially in the case of RAM) but I want to keep the price of this system down and really feel that a 1.4 is not really worth the hassle if I can probably do just fine with a 1.2...as well as the hassle of tossing out some extra dollars for processing power I may never use. But then again, who knows. The thing I have is should I follow the one guy's advice and go with a 1.4 (assuming asus says it's all right) or just stick with my original decision. I'm one of those people who sort of believe in upgrading if your current setup begins to show limitations.
I know some guys on the harmony-central board felt concerned that I said I was going to try to build a system between $500-$700. They felt it was too cheap and as they put it buying behind the curve . They recommended like some $1200 for a good system. I mean I know if I had all kinds of money I'm sure I'd splurge a little bit on it but I don't, and so I'd like to create a system that's within my budget and can fit my needs very well. For example the guys on HC suggested 2 60 gig hard drives but for my uses and my anal retentive ways of conserving hard drive space I don't need 2 60 gig hard drives. I feel my decision for 1 20 gig (OS, apps) and one 40 gig (audio) will suit me perfectly. I say as long as CD's don't become obsolete I probably won't upgrade much to my system. As long as it has the ability to record my takes and play em back without problems I'll be fine. Ughh, I don't know. Help!
Ok, the problem I'm currently having (since I've already picked a mobo which is the Asus A7A266) is what processor to get. I have came to the conclusion though that I'll get an Athlon but now it's a matter of what kind (T-Bird, XP...) My mobo supports speeds up to 1.2Ghz or so it seems that is what I've read. I posted a message on another message board (harmony-central) and someone there suggested for me to get at least an XP 1700+. I looked at that processor to see the speed and it was like a 1.4. I have emailed asus to see if that mobo can support bigger processors than a 1.2...I'm still awaiting a response though. But as I've said it once and I'll say it again, I probably will not be doing 50+ tracks or anything (of anything it's at most like 20 tracks). So my original decision was to stick with a 1.2...I felt that'd be just fine, especially since I know some people here *cough* Gidge *cough* get by with much much less than a 1.2 and have good results. I know sometimes it's good to buy a little extra (especially in the case of RAM) but I want to keep the price of this system down and really feel that a 1.4 is not really worth the hassle if I can probably do just fine with a 1.2...as well as the hassle of tossing out some extra dollars for processing power I may never use. But then again, who knows. The thing I have is should I follow the one guy's advice and go with a 1.4 (assuming asus says it's all right) or just stick with my original decision. I'm one of those people who sort of believe in upgrading if your current setup begins to show limitations.
I know some guys on the harmony-central board felt concerned that I said I was going to try to build a system between $500-$700. They felt it was too cheap and as they put it buying behind the curve . They recommended like some $1200 for a good system. I mean I know if I had all kinds of money I'm sure I'd splurge a little bit on it but I don't, and so I'd like to create a system that's within my budget and can fit my needs very well. For example the guys on HC suggested 2 60 gig hard drives but for my uses and my anal retentive ways of conserving hard drive space I don't need 2 60 gig hard drives. I feel my decision for 1 20 gig (OS, apps) and one 40 gig (audio) will suit me perfectly. I say as long as CD's don't become obsolete I probably won't upgrade much to my system. As long as it has the ability to record my takes and play em back without problems I'll be fine. Ughh, I don't know. Help!