W.S. Walcott
New member
What is the difference in sound/playability in these two fretboard options
W.S. Walcott said:What is the difference in sound/playability in these two fretboard options
Sorry, I tend to disagree with this. Maple is actually a harder/denser wood than rosewood, and therefore won't wear as fast.Imaduck said:Maple seems to dent a little easier, and the edges wear down faster (to give that "broken-in" feel). I've always preferred the feel of maple (not birds-eye though, I never really liked that).
Farview said:mape fretboards normally have a finish on them, rosewood does not.
Yeah, I dunno, you're probably right; my oldest guitar has a maple neck and it seems much more worn/dented than the others, but then again, I guess it's probably more to the fact that it's my oldest guitarpennylink said:Sorry, I tend to disagree with this. Maple is actually a harder/denser wood than rosewood, and therefore won't wear as fast.
Dani Pace said:Maple is almost maintenance free, except for an occasional cleaning while rosewood needs a few drops of lemon oil rubbed into it from time to time to keep its slick feel. QUOTE]
Though, if you play alot, the finish on a maple board will wear off and need to be refinished.
grinder said:Though, if you play alot, the finish on a maple board will wear off and need to be refinished.
boingoman said:But it looks so much cooler if you don't, and my wear marks are kind of "fret markers" for me.
pennylink said:Sorry, I tend to disagree with this. Maple is actually a harder/denser wood than rosewood, and therefore won't wear as fast.
I second the fact that maple is a tad brighter though and doesn't need the maintainance that rosewood does.
grinder said:Not me, I can't stand a grungy fretboard.
boingoman said:(pops a beer, sits on couch, picks up guitar without washing hands)