TNO said:I've got both and the M69 is more about warm mids but still pretty clear. The M88 is the one I'm lusting after.
paddyponchero said:Thanks, I guess I should hold out for an M88, heard one on sax a couple of nights ago - WOW!
Han said:The M88 has more bottom than the M69 and the hi end is a tad more silky.
Both the M69 and M88 are very rejective, so in a 'recording band at once' situation, these are probably one of the best mics to use the more because they have a nice off axis response.
But a M88 on sax? I used a M88 on sousaphone lately, together with a Senny MD441. The 441 was much smoother, the 88 has too much 'crack' for that.
I've never experienced a bad Beyer mic though.
chessparov said:Nice scores Paddy.
Your X1, if it's up to specs, will sound like an expensive ribbon BTW.
And the M88 on many singers, will rival the "Neumanns" IMHO.
Never A/B'd the 441 and M88 directly but...
Been said that "you only need a pair of 441's to make a fine sounding album"-as long as you've got the AE chops.
Chris
chessparov said:Nice scores Paddy.
Your X1, if it's up to specs, will sound like an expensive ribbon BTW.
And the M88 on many singers, will rival the "Neumanns" IMHO.
Never A/B'd the 441 and M88 directly but...
Been said that "you only need a pair of 441's to make a fine sounding album"-as long as you've got the AE chops.
Chris
Han said:But a M88 on sax? I used a M88 on sousaphone lately, together with a Senny MD441. The 441 was much smoother, the 88 has too much 'crack' for that.