
TimN
New member
So says Bob Katz, and the article in the current SOS magazine (February) by Hugh Robjohns is must-reading. Very good news indeed.
I doubt it will change overnight but at least people are starting to at least become aware of it, then they wonder why so many 70s records sound so amazing![]()
"Amazing" is relative. While I find a lot of 70s recordings pleasurable, there is an appreciable lack of low end due to the limitations of vinyl. They are very different from modern, full-bandwidth recordings. Vintage recordings also tend to sound bandpassed to me. If we could get the dynamic range back with the benefits of extended range recordings, I'd be a happy camper.
Limited and centered low end content, limited high-frequency content, noise floor, limited dynamic range, etc., etc.What are these limitations of vinyl [Mo Facta is] speaking of? Does that go with modern vinyl records too?
I agree with the above. -16bdLUFS is the itunes standard now.... This does not cover all the places audio will receive playback, i.e. PA, clubs etc. Should apple or the creators decide??