mrface2112
Well-known member
hey xstatic--
right on brother. that's exactly what i was trying to say.
the 58 is a "known" that anyone who's run sound for more than about 30 minutes will have an immediate knowledge on how to handle. AND they take eq quite well (so it's easy to dial out whatever nasties might be there).
i don't like the 58 for me b/c it emphasizes the nasally aspects of my voice in a BAD way. the senn 835 does not--and in fact, it seems to "enrich" my voice somewhat. i'm sure this can be done with eq to some extent on a 58. but in the spirit of "fix it at the source", it's easier for me (when running sound and playing at the same time) to put up the 835 than deal with eqing the snot out of a 58 while trying to sing and play.
but if i had to deal with bands sight-unseen and needed a mic that i could rely on for consistent performance night after night.....i'd opt for the 58.
cheers,
wade
right on brother. that's exactly what i was trying to say.
the 58 is a "known" that anyone who's run sound for more than about 30 minutes will have an immediate knowledge on how to handle. AND they take eq quite well (so it's easy to dial out whatever nasties might be there).
i don't like the 58 for me b/c it emphasizes the nasally aspects of my voice in a BAD way. the senn 835 does not--and in fact, it seems to "enrich" my voice somewhat. i'm sure this can be done with eq to some extent on a 58. but in the spirit of "fix it at the source", it's easier for me (when running sound and playing at the same time) to put up the 835 than deal with eqing the snot out of a 58 while trying to sing and play.
but if i had to deal with bands sight-unseen and needed a mic that i could rely on for consistent performance night after night.....i'd opt for the 58.
cheers,
wade