fierywater
New member
I bought into this whole recording thing a while back, though to be honest, I just started actively creating music a month or so ago. I have a Roland RS-50 connected with an Omni I/O, and all the necessary equipment for now. But I've started writing things, and I've realized something.
The RS-50 doesn't feel like an instrument. It just feels like a box of sounds that tries to recreate every sound known to man, with varying success. It's not an analog synth, and it's not a high-quality digital synth. With a guitar, you have your sound, which you can modify. With an analog synth, it seems, most everything is a series modifications to the basic sound. The RS-50 (and most do-it-all synths) doesn't seem to have a sound of its own, it simply tries to emulate everything else.
I'm not the greatest pianist, and I really enjoy creating the music infinitely more than playing it. So the 61 keys seem both intimidating and unnecessary at times. It seems strange, but I almost feel like I'd be happier with a 37-key Alesis Micron or Korg Microkorg than I am with my RS-50, because they're dedicated to what they do. My bandmate (and cousin) plays guitar, and loves it. I love creating music and putting it together, and to an extent I enjoy playing it. I'm a decent singer, as well. But I don't feel like the RS-50 fits what I want to do.
I'm a teenager (17), and I was forced to take piano for about five years before I couldn't take it anymore. My piano teacher taught me how to play piano pieces off sheets, but nothing of music theory. I've basically had to teach myself everything I know about it. I won't deny that my piano playing ability has suffered since I stopped taking lessons. My father helped me buy the RS-50 (though nearly everything else has been completely out of my pocket), so I feel uncomfortable about wanting to be rid of it.
But I'm not sure that I don't want to be rid of it. Like I said, I don't feel like it's an instrument. It's somewhat hard to carry around, requires a decent amount of setting up, and is overkill for what I like to do. It's not like, during a gig, I'd ever need to use more than a few different patches. I'd rather have something more...personal? Even if it had less capabilities, I feel like I'd rather play something that did one thing well, as opposed to a jack-of-all-trades (and master of none).
Maybe I'm not giving the RS-50 enough credit, or maybe I'm right and it's not the instrument for me. I feel like it might be too much for what I want to do. Having something that's completely overkill may not be a bad thing to most, but to me, it seems completely irrational.
Any thoughts on this? What do most keyboardists do to make their sound seem their own? It seems incredibly difficult. Do they limit the number of patches they use, or do they use them all? I feel somewhat lost, and I'm not sure if you guys can help, but any (semi-constructive) responses would be nice.
The RS-50 doesn't feel like an instrument. It just feels like a box of sounds that tries to recreate every sound known to man, with varying success. It's not an analog synth, and it's not a high-quality digital synth. With a guitar, you have your sound, which you can modify. With an analog synth, it seems, most everything is a series modifications to the basic sound. The RS-50 (and most do-it-all synths) doesn't seem to have a sound of its own, it simply tries to emulate everything else.
I'm not the greatest pianist, and I really enjoy creating the music infinitely more than playing it. So the 61 keys seem both intimidating and unnecessary at times. It seems strange, but I almost feel like I'd be happier with a 37-key Alesis Micron or Korg Microkorg than I am with my RS-50, because they're dedicated to what they do. My bandmate (and cousin) plays guitar, and loves it. I love creating music and putting it together, and to an extent I enjoy playing it. I'm a decent singer, as well. But I don't feel like the RS-50 fits what I want to do.
I'm a teenager (17), and I was forced to take piano for about five years before I couldn't take it anymore. My piano teacher taught me how to play piano pieces off sheets, but nothing of music theory. I've basically had to teach myself everything I know about it. I won't deny that my piano playing ability has suffered since I stopped taking lessons. My father helped me buy the RS-50 (though nearly everything else has been completely out of my pocket), so I feel uncomfortable about wanting to be rid of it.
But I'm not sure that I don't want to be rid of it. Like I said, I don't feel like it's an instrument. It's somewhat hard to carry around, requires a decent amount of setting up, and is overkill for what I like to do. It's not like, during a gig, I'd ever need to use more than a few different patches. I'd rather have something more...personal? Even if it had less capabilities, I feel like I'd rather play something that did one thing well, as opposed to a jack-of-all-trades (and master of none).
Maybe I'm not giving the RS-50 enough credit, or maybe I'm right and it's not the instrument for me. I feel like it might be too much for what I want to do. Having something that's completely overkill may not be a bad thing to most, but to me, it seems completely irrational.
Any thoughts on this? What do most keyboardists do to make their sound seem their own? It seems incredibly difficult. Do they limit the number of patches they use, or do they use them all? I feel somewhat lost, and I'm not sure if you guys can help, but any (semi-constructive) responses would be nice.