YanKleber
Retired
Yes they did. It was a simple answer - "no"...so easily missed in all the side discussions.
Actually you cannot answer a "how far we are..." question with a "no".
Yes they did. It was a simple answer - "no"...so easily missed in all the side discussions.
The answer "No", totally applies.Wouldn't it be really a thing?
"No" also makes total sense as a response to that.I sincerely think that it IS possible and that overtime someone will release a tool able to do that. What do you fellows think about this?
Actually, you never asked that in your OP. You asked: The answer "No", totally applies.
Your next statement/question was....."No" also makes total sense as a response to that.
I was scared to even respond. Now, I might have to scroll through a 21 paragraph response that I'll stop reading after the first 2 paragraphs and need to take a nap.Rami just tell him what he wants to hear. That's the only answer anyone wants.
dont nap with headphones on. It will give you an unrealistic sleeping experience.
Yes, but if I ignore physics, common sense, the past experience of thousands of other people, and the truth, I can convince myself of anything. Besides, I can't afford an expensive bed, so my headphone nap experience is just as good no matter what the actual truth is. That's my bullshit story and I'm sticking to it.Dont nap with headphones on. It will give you an unrealistic sleeping experience.
You owe me royalties.stuck in a dream?
I date myself all the time. I don't even buy myself dinner, but I always put out.Oh shit, did I just date myself?
You owe me royalties.
I'm always impressed and extremely flattered when someone remembers ANYTHING about any of my tunes, let alone a title.Context is everything.
But did you like how smooth that fit in there?
Haha, and you were sharp enough to catch it.
I prefer a good over an accurate sound.Commercially available headphones/earbuds are designed to sound "good" rather than "accurate".
Not for mixing you don't. Well, maybe YOU do, but that's a whole other story.