danyoung1994
New member
Why would you place a guitarist in say the console room and his amp in the live room when tracking guitars? Why not have them both in the same room with headphones?
Why would you place a guitarist in say the console room and his amp in the live room when tracking guitars? Why not have them both in the same room with headphones?
Why would you place a guitarist in say the console room and his amp in the live room when tracking guitars? Why not have them both in the same room with headphones?
Why would you place a guitarist in say the console room and his amp in the live room when tracking guitars? Why not have them both in the same room with headphones?
I'm sure he means the second set are for the engineer.
I don't see the point of an amp in the control room and then everyone wearing headphones in the control room...it kinda defeats the purpose of having a seperate control room....but if it works for you, go for it.
The reason to put the amp out in the live room and the player in the control room is so he can hear the playback through the monitors instead of headphones, and/or so he can really crank the shit out of the amp and not have to be there next to it with headphones on.
My studio is just one space, so it's a moot point, I always wear headphones unless I'm recording something DI, like bass guitar or maybe a keyboard....plus with the headphones, I can still crank the shit out of the amp and not blow out my ears.
It just takes an extra pass to then hear the playback through the monitors after the fact....but it's not as big deal, as I think we always end up listening to playbacks many times anyway between takes.
I think he actually meant to have the amp and guitarist in the tracking (live) room, wearing headphones. The way he stated it isn't exactly clear, but I think that's what he meant.
As one who was in a 25 x17 x 10ft room during the development voicing of a 200watt valve amp into two 4 x12 xV30s I can quite see why a guitarist would want a break.
Yes, I had deffs'. Din't help a whole lot.
Dave.
Ding ding ding...2. We could dial in a sound through the mics, which is the way the rest of the world will hear it. What the amp sounds like in the room doesn't matter at all, no one is in there listening to it. The only thing that matters is what it sounds like through the mics. Having the guitarist only hear it that way cut down on tone arguments.
2. We could dial in a sound through the mics, which is the way the rest of the world will hear it. What the amp sounds like in the room doesn't matter at all, no one is in there listening to it. The only thing that matters is what it sounds like through the mics. Having the guitarist only hear it that way cut down on tone arguments.
Nah, have him get 'his sound' in the control room through the mics. It's ussually not that far off from what he has. If it is unusable sounding through the mics, 'his sound' sucks and you need to help him fix that.
I've also noticed that most guitar players' "sound" has little to do with the actaul sound coming from the speakers and more to do with the feel of it. For example, a lot of guys that have a huge amount of fuzzy gain are really just looking for the smoothness. You can back off the gain alot if you plug in a comp/sustainer pedal to give them the smoothness back.
I think what Jay is trying to say is that a sound recording engineer of decades standing and experience is far more likely to get a good guitar sound than some 10% deaf already, wet behind the ears guitar super ego!