Completed my patchbay setup!



I'm very excited that I got this done and even more importantly, everything works.

It wasn't without fail though. Yesterday, through a complete state of confusion, I "parallel" jumped every one of my PB-32 modules. Turned out, that was a huge mistake and created a feedback loop. The stupid part is that I didn't test one module first before doing all 8, so I screwed myself into another hour of work desoldering the crap... I then figured out after reading some old threads, how to connect the Tascam 388 ACCESS send/recv jacks to the patchbay. Basically, these just plugged into the un-switched side of the bay. For my rack effects, or anything I wanted to bring out to the front, I needed to flip those modules so that the white (switched) side was in the back, connected to the effects.

Nice to finally have a logical workflow...
 
Nice set up there. I may pick your brain as to how you hooked up the patch bay. I'm a new 388 owner myself and am finally started to acquire some outboard gear. I have the old DBX 163 with wood panels as well.

Brian
 
Nice set up there. I may pick your brain as to how you hooked up the patch bay. I'm a new 388 owner myself and am finally started to acquire some outboard gear. I have the old DBX 163 with wood panels as well.

Brian

It took more trial and error than it should have, mostly because I get these great ideas and then I'm just lazy...

The back of my 388 is pretty much like this:

*XLR jack panel in my wall that feeds 8 cables to the 8 mic pres (ch 1-8). This is for plugging in on the studio side, as I have a separate control room
*Each channel has ACCESS send/rcv jacks. I plugged each of these (16 total) into my Tascam patchbay. The best I can tell you on this is that they needed to be plugged into the "un-switched" side of the patchbay, because they are already half-normalled inside the 388 (or something like that). That is why you see that half my bay has white jacks and the other side is red. The red ones are un-switched, so I reversed 4 of the modules for the other half. I plugged the sends into the top row and the recv into the bottom row. To make my life easier, I used a 1/4" to RCA snake for 4 of the channels, but then for the other 4 I had to go buy individual Hosa 1/4" to RCA dual cables because no one had a freaking snake in stock. I strapped all of those to the existing snake and it's fine. I labeled each cable so I didn't have to guess later on. That took what seemed like hours but was so worth it. What I just did was bring my ACCESS send/recv jacks to the front of the patchbay.
*DBX compressors, Lexicon effects - these had to be plugged into the "switched" side of the bay (white) so I did the same thing, Outputs on the top, Inputs on the bottom for each compressor and effect. My DBX 164 is running in mono so I have both inputs connected on a Y-cable and one output used (per the manual).
*The BBE thing is not patched into the bay, rather I ran the stereo outputs from the 388 directly to the BBE and then from there the BBE goes to my Firepod inputs. That's just for the 388 stereo mix when I import it into Logic, and honestly never even used it yet - may not have to.
*The main CR outputs from my Firepod go back to the stereo inputs on the 388 so I can hear my computer audio back through the mixer. Monitor outputs feed to my 2 monitors using RCA to 1/4" adapters.

So now I can just patch the compressors and Lexicon into channels using the front of the patchbay. I prefer not to use the effects/aux sends because those don't print to tape, and I really don't care for doing effects only on mixdown to digital. A bit more final but it forces me to make choices.
 
Congrats! I know from experience that a patchbay is essential when you have a lot of outboard gear. I don't have a lot (more than most "in the box" recordists, probably), but I have three patchbays in use currently.
 

Attachments

  • Patchbay.jpg
    Patchbay.jpg
    673.9 KB · Views: 50
  • Right rack.jpg
    Right rack.jpg
    931.6 KB · Views: 66
Nice, you have cool stuff...

How do you like the Tascam US-1800? I may be getting one of those to replace my Firepod soon; I don't think I can keep a firewire device around for much longer...
 
Nice, you have cool stuff...

How do you like the Tascam US-1800? I may be getting one of those to replace my Firepod soon; I don't think I can keep a firewire device around for much longer...

Thanks. The US-1800 has been perfect. It was dead easy to get working and I haven't had any issues with it thus far at all. I don't have any experience with super high-end A/D converters, so I can't speak to the sound quality in that regard. But it sounds great to me. I don't imagine I would be able to hear a difference between it and an Apogee or anything, though, as I don't think I have the most sensitive hearing in the world. :)

My next studio adventure will be getting my newly acquired 388 wired into the patchbay as well. :)
 
Thanks. The US-1800 has been perfect. It was dead easy to get working and I haven't had any issues with it thus far at all. I don't have any experience with super high-end A/D converters, so I can't speak to the sound quality in that regard. But it sounds great to me. I don't imagine I would be able to hear a difference between it and an Apogee or anything, though, as I don't think I have the most sensitive hearing in the world. :)

My next studio adventure will be getting my newly acquired 388 wired into the patchbay as well. :)

Love the SDE 1000! That delay is awesome for live shows! I have two collecting dust. :(
 
Love the SDE 1000! That delay is awesome for live shows! I have two collecting dust. :(

Yeah I love that thing too. I don't know if it's just that it's vintage, and so I want to like it more, or if it really does, but to me it sounds much dirtier and grittier (i.e., more similar to analog delay) than digital delays do today. Maybe it's because in the early days of digital delay, they were trying to emulate analog delays because that's what they were used to ... I dunno. At any rate, I really dig it. I used to have a Fostex 3050 as well, and I liked that one a lot too. It had a similar gritty character to it.
 
Back
Top